LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>,
	Andrey Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com>,
	Alexander Mikhalitsyn <alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prctl: allow to setup brk for et_dyn executables
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:17:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <98915534-2309-cbbd-b77e-354dd274ed00@virtuozzo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121221207.GB2174@grain>

CC: Pavel and Alexander

On 22.01.2021 01:12, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> Keno Fischer reported that when a binray loaded via
> ld-linux-x the prctl(PR_SET_MM_MAP) doesn't allow to
> setup brk value because it lays before mm:end_data.
> 
> For example a test program shows
> 
>  | # ~/t
>  |
>  | start_code      401000
>  | end_code        401a15
>  | start_stack     7ffce4577dd0
>  | start_data	   403e10
>  | end_data        40408c
>  | start_brk	   b5b000
>  | sbrk(0)         b5b000
> 
> and when executed via ld-linux
> 
>  | # /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ~/t
>  |
>  | start_code      7fc25b0a4000
>  | end_code        7fc25b0c4524
>  | start_stack     7fffcc6b2400
>  | start_data	   7fc25b0ce4c0
>  | end_data        7fc25b0cff98
>  | start_brk	   55555710c000
>  | sbrk(0)         55555710c000
> 
> This of course prevent criu from restoring such programs.
> Looking into how kernel operates with brk/start_brk inside
> brk() syscall I don't see any problem if we allow to setup
> brk/start_brk without checking for end_data. Even if someone
> pass some weird address here on a purpose then the worst
> possible result will be an unexpected unmapping of existing
> vma (own vma, since prctl works with the callers memory) but
> test for RLIMIT_DATA is still valid and a user won't be able
> to gain more memory in case of expanding VMAs via new values
> shipped with prctl call.
> 
> Reported-by: Keno Fischer <keno@juliacomputing.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> CC: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
> CC: Andrey Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
> CC: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
> CC: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> ---
> Guys, take a look please once time permit. Hopefully I didn't
> miss something 'cause made this patch via code reading only.
> 
> Andrey, do we still have a criu container which tests new kernels,
> right? Would be great to run criu tests with this patch applied
> to make sure everything is intact.
> 
>  kernel/sys.c |    7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-tip.git/kernel/sys.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-tip.git.orig/kernel/sys.c
> +++ linux-tip.git/kernel/sys.c
> @@ -1943,13 +1943,6 @@ static int validate_prctl_map_addr(struc
>  	error = -EINVAL;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * @brk should be after @end_data in traditional maps.
> -	 */
> -	if (prctl_map->start_brk <= prctl_map->end_data ||
> -	    prctl_map->brk <= prctl_map->end_data)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	/*
>  	 * Neither we should allow to override limits if they set.
>  	 */
>  	if (check_data_rlimit(rlimit(RLIMIT_DATA), prctl_map->brk,
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22  9:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21 22:12 Cyrill Gorcunov
2021-01-22  9:17 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2021-07-20  7:33 ` Andrei Vagin
2021-07-20 13:54   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2021-07-20 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2021-07-20 22:25   ` Cyrill Gorcunov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=98915534-2309-cbbd-b77e-354dd274ed00@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=0x7f454c46@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=avagin@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=keno@juliacomputing.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] prctl: allow to setup brk for et_dyn executables' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).