LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jeff Kirsher" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: andi@lisas.de
Cc: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bunk@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs...
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 01:34:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9929d2390811030134ybe1d8aaq43b5a533f73fee71@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081103080430.GA32459@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Andreas Mohr
<andim2@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 08:34:27AM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> Andreas Mohr wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:09:25PM -0800, Kok, Auke wrote:
>> >> Andreas Mohr wrote:
>> >>> Perhaps it's useful to file a bug/patch
>> >>> on http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/ ? Perhaps -mm testing?
>> >> I wanted to push this though our testing labs first which has not happened due to
>> >> time constraints - that should quickly at least confirm that the most common nics
>> >> work OK after the change with your patch. I'll try and see if we can get this
>> >> testing done soon.
>> >
>> > Oh, full-scale regression testing even? Nice idea...
>> > Would optionally be even better if during hardware tests one could also
>> > dig out some i82503-based card (or additional MII-less cards?)
>> > since I didn't really make any effort yet to try to make them all
>> > recognized/supported by my patch already (would have been out of scope anyway
>> > since I have this single card only).
>>
>> the problem is that I think that most of those (mii-less cards) are customly
>> designed by OEM's that buy the silicon and glue on a different interface and we
>> usually do not carry those designs in our labs apart from a few exceptions. So, I
>> can at least touch the common hardware in testing, but not the exotic stuff.
>
> Any update on how to get this support in? (it's not available in 2.6.28-rc2)
>
> As it stands, I'm not the only one who would need this...
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andreas Mohr
> --
>
I have a patch from Auke, which deals with the MII-less PHY's in e100.
I will check on the status of the patch and either let you know the
status or will be submitting a patch soon to netdev to address this
issue.
--
Cheers,
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-03 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-28 23:51 [RFC/PATCH] e100 driver didn't support any MII-less PHYs Andreas Mohr
2007-12-30 5:54 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-01 20:09 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-01-29 23:03 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-01-29 23:09 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-30 6:49 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-01-30 16:34 ` Kok, Auke
2008-11-03 8:04 ` Andreas Mohr
2008-11-03 9:34 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2008-01-01 20:10 ` Andreas Mohr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9929d2390811030134ybe1d8aaq43b5a533f73fee71@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=andi@lisas.de \
--cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).