LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kbuild question
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 08:14:40 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9AF725F4-FE65-4357-B7EB-CC03808C105D@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702161121540.14458@scrub.home>


On Feb 16, 2007, at 4:23 AM, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if there was some way to make a Kconfig menu  
>> either be just a
>> menu or a choice depending on another bool being set or not.
>>
>> What I'm trying to accomplish is if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set I  
>> want it so
>> you can only select on option, however if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is  
>> not set you
>> should be able to select multiple options.
>
> Could you please be more specific about the problem you're trying to
> solve, instead of how you're trying to solve it?
> A real example would help a lot to understand the actual problem.

Sure, on powerpc for some of the embedded sub-architectures you can  
only select a single board to build for.  For a lot of people this is  
sufficient, however we are moving towards a world where you can  
easily build in support for multiple boards into a single kernel.

I'd like to have it such that if I'm only building support for one  
board (CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE, not going to call it that, but for this  
discussion its sufficient), you get a choice menu from Kconfig  
enforcing the ability to only select one board.  However if ! 
CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE than you can select multiple boards to build  
into your kernel.

if CONFIG_ONLY_HAVE_ONE is set we can optimize out the runtime checks  
that get added for handling the multiple board case.

Hopefully that's clear.

- k

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-15 19:18 Kumar Gala
2007-02-15 22:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-15 23:44   ` Kumar Gala
2007-02-16  8:50     ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-16 10:23 ` Roman Zippel
2007-02-16 14:14   ` Kumar Gala [this message]
2007-02-18 17:16     ` Roman Zippel
2007-02-18 19:25       ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-03-15 15:22         ` Kumar Gala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9AF725F4-FE65-4357-B7EB-CC03808C105D@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    --subject='Re: kbuild question' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).