From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760812AbYA1OU2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:20:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755222AbYA1OUQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:20:16 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]:33765 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755166AbYA1OUO (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:20:14 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=wm3CeKxDAopw+qSfWG3AivXEWn9qw3tRU0WhfVP8LZrZoqz1JQcIyofUocyNNBlXrbLLAChq5T5aCnIXOjsQcuNSuMkof3PPf4XAp0/0+1UZSdwuOf7ZbdmvUxYTzvcU+rNENQWEl1bZMLa4xFWcPZDAkEm1uNdExXxkQXU9t7M= Message-ID: <9e4733910801280620t16ceb391vcc8e10ba6bbea183@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:20:13 -0500 From: "Jon Smirl" To: "Jean Delvare" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c updates for 2.6.25 Cc: "Linus Torvalds" , "Linux I2C" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20080128104348.0f6925f6@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080127182741.62bfe92a@hyperion.delvare> <9e4733910801270936q7affdee3o3518c2265acaf61d@mail.gmail.com> <20080128104348.0f6925f6@hyperion.delvare> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 1/28/08, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:36:03 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > > On 1/27/08, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Linus, > > > > > > Please pull the i2c subsystem updates for Linux 2.6.25 from: > > > > > > git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6 i2c-for-linus > > > > The support for modalias loading of i2c modules isn't in here, what's > > the status? > > The status is that I want to give people some time to comment on my > modalias patches before I merge them. I also didn't have the time to > look into the latest patches you sent yet, and I'd rather merge > everything at once. So the merge window for this is rather 2.6.26. Delaying these until 2.6.26 which won't be final until 2009 forces us to ship boxes using a private kernel. These patches have been around since November. Does it really take over a year to get these changes in? > > -- > Jean Delvare > -- Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com