LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
	cang@codeaurora.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, sc.suh@samsung.com,
	hy50.seo@samsung.com, sh425.lee@samsung.com,
	bhoon95.kim@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 09:18:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ed9f56c-d7a4-8e68-0968-da0eccb0b38d@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0f6f2337e98f8a8a7dfae816bc001af28fa3a7be.1628231581.git.kwmad.kim@samsung.com>

On 8/5/21 11:34 PM, Kiwoong Kim wrote:
> This patch is to activate some interrupt sources
> that aren't defined in UFSHCI specifications. Those
> purpose could be error handling, workaround or whatever.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 10 ++++++++++
>   drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |  8 ++++++++
>   2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 05495c34a2b7..f85a9b335e0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -6428,6 +6428,16 @@ static irqreturn_t ufshcd_tmc_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   static irqreturn_t ufshcd_sl_intr(struct ufs_hba *hba, u32 intr_status)
>   {
>   	irqreturn_t retval = IRQ_NONE;
> +	int res = 0;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	retval = ufshcd_vops_intr(hba, &res);
> +	if (res) {
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +		hba->force_reset = true;
> +		ufshcd_schedule_eh_work(hba);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
> +	}

How can a non-standard extension have error handling code in common 
code? Please move the code under if (res) into the vendor code.

>   	if (intr_status & UFSHCD_UIC_MASK)
>   		retval |= ufshcd_uic_cmd_compl(hba, intr_status);
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> index 971cfabc4a1e..1ed0a911f864 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
> @@ -356,6 +356,7 @@ struct ufs_hba_variant_ops {
>   			       const union ufs_crypto_cfg_entry *cfg, int slot);
>   	void	(*event_notify)(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   				enum ufs_event_type evt, void *data);
> +	irqreturn_t	(*intr)(struct ufs_hba *hba, int *res);
>   };
>   
>   /* clock gating state  */
> @@ -1296,6 +1297,13 @@ static inline void ufshcd_vops_config_scaling_param(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   		hba->vops->config_scaling_param(hba, profile, data);
>   }
>   
> +static inline irqreturn_t ufshcd_vops_intr(struct ufs_hba *hba, int *res)
> +{
> +	if (hba->vops && hba->vops->intr)
> +		return hba->vops->intr(hba, res);
> +	return IRQ_NONE;
> +}
> +
>   extern struct ufs_pm_lvl_states ufs_pm_lvl_states[];

So this code adds an indirect function call in the interrupt handler? 
This will have a negative impact on performance, especially on a kernel 
with security mitigations enabled. See also 
https://lwn.net/Articles/774743/.

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 16:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20210806064923epcas2p13dd6b442eed02404d87684afd9c1b229@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
2021-08-06  6:34 ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] " Kiwoong Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20210806064924epcas2p4572538fd1fa7a73d8262737e38a9b537@epcas2p4.samsung.com>
2021-08-06  6:34     ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] " Kiwoong Kim
2021-08-06 16:18       ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2021-08-09  7:33         ` Kiwoong Kim
     [not found]   ` <CGME20210806064925epcas2p2ba7e711758614384c17648d4924d025c@epcas2p2.samsung.com>
2021-08-06  6:34     ` [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: ufs-exynos: implement exynos isr Kiwoong Kim
2021-08-06 16:37       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-09  7:31         ` Kiwoong Kim
2021-08-06 16:14   ` [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr Bart Van Assche
2021-08-08  5:56     ` Avri Altman
2021-08-09  7:46     ` Kiwoong Kim
2021-08-09 16:08       ` Bart Van Assche
2021-08-13  5:31         ` Kiwoong Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ed9f56c-d7a4-8e68-0968-da0eccb0b38d@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bhoon95.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hy50.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sc.suh@samsung.com \
    --cc=sh425.lee@samsung.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: introduce vendor isr' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).