LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@huawei.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>, Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<will@kernel.org>, <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>,
	<anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>, <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <f.fangjian@huawei.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:48:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fdb2ad3-539f-fb4d-7a96-c737fec967f7@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129233514.e59d953a7d90d9f4f3d6a097@kernel.org>



On 2021/11/29 22:35, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I meet a problem when I use SYM_CODE_START(optprobe_template) to replace
>>>>>> optprobe_template_entry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If SYM_CODE_START is used, all optprobe will share one trampoline space.
>>>>>> Under this circumstances, if user register two optprobes, trampoline
>>>>>> will be overwritten by the newer one, and this will cause kernel panic
>>>>>> when the old optprobe is trigger.
>>>>> Hm, this is curious, because the template should be copied to the
>>>>> trampoline buffer for each optprobe and be modified.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Using optprobe_template_entry will not have this problem, as each
>>>>>> optprobe has its own trampoline space (alloced in get_opinsn_slot()).
>>>>> Yes, it is designed to do so.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>> Hi Masami,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your reply. But I also met a problem when using
>>>> get_opinsn_slot() to alloc trampoline buffer.
>>>>
>>>> As module_alloc(like x86) is used to alloc buffer, trampoline is in
>>>> module space, so if origin insn is in kernel space, the range between
>>>> origin insn and trampoline is out of 128M.
>>>>
>>>> As module PLT cannot used here, I have no idea to achieve long jump in
>>>> this situation. Do you have any good idea?
>> Hi Masami,
>>
>> Thanks so much for your reply.
>>
>>> One possible solution is to use pre-allocated trampoline space in
>>> the text area, as same as ppc64 does.
>>> (See arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes_head.S, it embeds a space at "optinsn_slot")
>>>
>> I find something interesting in arch/powerpc/kernel/optprobes.c, it use
>> "optinsn_slot" as a public buffer, and use a static "insn_page_in_use"
>> to make sure there is only one optprobe in kernel.
>>
>> If we use this solution , users could only register one optprobe each
>> time. This will also be a limitation for users, what's your opinion
>> about this?
> No, that is just a memory area for pooling trampoline buffer. So optprobe
> can allocate the buffer from that area. Please see kernel/kprobes.c:344.
> optprobe allocates "insn_slot" from kprobe_optinsn_slots, which uses
> alloc_optinsn_page() to allocate the pool of slots.
> 
> Thank you,
> 

Hi,

Thanks for your reply, I test alloc_optinsn_page() and it does work well 
to alloc the pool of slots.

But when I tried to use module PLT, something seems wrong here.
Arm64 Module PLT in mod->arch.ftrace_trampolines is set in 
module_finalize, after that, mod->arch.ftrace_trampolines seems to be a 
read-only memory. But in arch_optimize_kprobes() we need to modify the 
destination of PLT (as each optprobe has its own trampoline buffer), if 
so, we cannot get rid of the 128M branch limit :(

Thanks,
Qi

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30  6:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-18  7:33 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: " Qi Liu
2021-08-18  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] Make save_all_base_regs and restore_all_base_regs as common macro Qi Liu
2021-08-18  7:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64 Qi Liu
2021-08-18 16:27   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-08-24 10:50   ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-24 11:50     ` Barry Song
2021-08-24 12:11       ` Mark Rutland
2021-08-24 12:42         ` Barry Song
2021-08-25  2:13     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-08-25  3:12       ` Barry Song
2021-09-07  3:14     ` liuqi (BA)
2021-11-26 10:31     ` liuqi (BA)
2021-11-27 12:23       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-29  1:40         ` liuqi (BA)
2021-11-29  5:00           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-29  6:50             ` liuqi (BA)
2021-11-29 14:35               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-11-30  6:48                 ` liuqi (BA) [this message]
2021-12-01  1:50                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-12-01  2:55                     ` liuqi (BA)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fdb2ad3-539f-fb4d-7a96-c737fec967f7@huawei.com \
    --to=liuqi115@huawei.com \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fangjian@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).