LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Menny Hamburger" <>
To: <>
Subject: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:34:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)


In the following document:
The following is noted:
"The risk is that other hosts can probe for VIP using unicast packets
for which the hidden flag always replies. I'll continue to support the
hidden flag 
for 2.4 and 2.6 to help existing setups but switching to the new device
flags (or other solutions) is recommended".

If there is currently no way to provide this functionality using
arp_ignore/arp_annonce/arp_filter or their friends, why is this still a
And is not integrated into the mainline kernel?


             reply	other threads:[~2007-02-13  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-13  8:34 Menny Hamburger [this message]
2007-02-13  8:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-02-13 10:16   ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: ARP hidden patch vs. arp ignore/announce' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).