LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <>
To: Kacper Kornet <>
Cc:, Jiri Slaby <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix prlimit64 for suid/sgid processes
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:59:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 1/27/11, Kacper Kornet <> wrote:
> Since check_prlimit_permission always fails in the case of SUID/GUID
> processes, such processes are not able to read or set their own limits.
> This commit changes this by assuming that process can always read/change
> its own limits.

Shouldn't this be fixed in check_prlimit_permissions() instead of in the caller?


  reply	other threads:[~2011-01-27 22:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-27 13:47 Kacper Kornet
2011-01-27 22:59 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2011-01-28 23:21   ` [PATCH v2] " Kacper Kornet
2011-01-28 23:28     ` Jiri Slaby
2011-01-31  9:40     ` [for .36,.37 stable] " Jiri Slaby
2011-02-15 14:28       ` [stable] [for .36, .37 " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] Fix prlimit64 for suid/sgid processes' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).