LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: for_each_cpu() is buggy for UP kernel?
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 10:21:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFziNcDmN=DT7efKYGU-AZC535GDVKh57bC7UHaFff3vRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SG2P15301MB0015F23FF0E44BE991E8C38EBF930@SG2P15301MB0015.APCP153.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 8:02 PM Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com> wrote:
> If you're OK with the below fix (not tested yet), I'll submit a patch for
it:
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> @@ -616,6 +616,10 @@ static void tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast(struct
clock_event_device *dev)
> now = ktime_get();
> /* Find all expired events */
> for_each_cpu(cpu, tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask) {
> +#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (cpumask_empty(tick_broadcast_oneshot_mask))
> + break;
> +#endif
I'm certainly ok with this. It's hacky, but maybe being explicitly hacky is
good to "document" this gotcha.
And I really do agree that this special UP case is nasty nasty and much too
subtle, and I hope that some day we won't care about UP at all, and maybe
kill it, or maybe just make for_each_cpu() generate the extra code to have
the actual same semantics as the SMP case.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-15 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-09 6:24 Dexuan Cui
2018-05-09 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2018-05-13 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-05-13 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-14 7:28 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-05-15 3:02 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-15 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2018-05-15 20:10 ` Dexuan Cui
2018-05-15 19:52 ` [PATCH] tick/broadcast: Use for_each_cpu() specially on UP kernels Dexuan Cui
2018-05-15 20:48 ` [tip:timers/urgent] " tip-bot for Dexuan Cui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFziNcDmN=DT7efKYGU-AZC535GDVKh57bC7UHaFff3vRw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--subject='Re: for_each_cpu() is buggy for UP kernel?' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).