LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
To: Li Tuo <islituo@gmail.com>
Cc: amit karwar <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
	Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com>,
	Xinming Hu <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"<netdev@vger.kernel.org>" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	baijiaju1990@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] mwifiex: possible null-pointer dereference in mwifiex_dnld_cmd_to_fw()
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 13:44:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ASDXPYbCFsu0zoTafgc3atHvK1TAx=S_NTkfb0UNtKwuZOZQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <968036b8-df27-3f22-074b-3aeed7c7bbf2@gmail.com>

Hi,

On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 9:13 PM Li Tuo <islituo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Our static analysis tool finds a possible null-pointer dereference in
> the mwifiex driver in Linux 5.14.0-rc3:

Wouldn't be the first time a static analysis tool tripped up over
excessively redundant "safety" checks :)

For example:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20210731163546.10753-1-len.baker@gmx.com/T/#u

> The variable cmd_node->cmd_skb->data is assigned to the variable
> host_cmd, and host_cmd is checked in:
> 190:    if (host_cmd == NULL || host_cmd->size == 0)
>
> This indicates that host_cmd can be NULL.
> If so, the function mwifiex_recycle_cmd_node() will be called with the
> argument cmd_node:
> 196:    mwifiex_recycle_cmd_node(adapter, cmd_node);
>
> In this called function, the variable cmd_node->cmd_skb->data is
> assigned to the variable host_cmd, too.
> Thus the variable host_cmd in the function mwifiex_recycle_cmd_node()
> can be also NULL.
> However, it is dereferenced when calling le16_to_cpu():
> 144:    le16_to_cpu(host_cmd->command)
>
> I am not quite sure whether this possible null-pointer dereference is
> real and how to fix it if it is real.
> Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks!

I doubt it's real; the NULL check is probably excessive. I don't think
there's any case in which such skb's will have no ->data. If you're
interested, you could test and submit a "fix" to drop the excess
check.

Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-31  4:13 Li Tuo
2021-08-02 20:44 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2021-08-03  2:34   ` Li Tuo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-07-31  3:45 Li Tuo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+ASDXPYbCFsu0zoTafgc3atHvK1TAx=S_NTkfb0UNtKwuZOZQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=briannorris@chromium.org \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=islituo@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sharvari.harisangam@nxp.com \
    --subject='Re: [BUG] mwifiex: possible null-pointer dereference in mwifiex_dnld_cmd_to_fw()' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).