LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com>
To: Adam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com>
Cc: Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 11:55:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+zEjCv8tExoZx309qRMe6KCZ=-AC+nCOV7qivJWE5gCqrd2MA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB9PR10MB46523AE6EF51D6C801B4A9BF80A99@DB9PR10MB4652.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

Hi Adam,

Thank you for your answer.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 3:33 PM Adam Thomson
<Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> wrote:
>
> On 24 September 2021 17:17, Alexandre Ghiti wrote:
>
> > > > +static int da9063_restart_notify(struct notifier_block *this,
> > > > +                              unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct da9063 *da9063 = container_of(this, struct da9063,
> > > > restart_handler);
> > > > +
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_PAGE_CON, 0x00);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_F, 0x04);
> > > > +     regmap_write(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_CONTROL_A, 0x68);
> > > > +
> > > > +     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> > > > +}
> > >
> > > I will talk with our HW team to clarify, but this sequence looks to be very
> > > specific to the needs of the platform in question which doesn't feel right to
> > > me. As was mentioned on another thread as well, the watchdog driver already
> > has
> > > a restart function to reset the device (and thus the system), so I don't believe
> > > we should have multiple of these.
> >
> > From the discussion that happened here
> > https://www.dialog-semiconductor.com/products/pmics?post_id=10052#tab-
> > support_tab_content,
> > it does not seem possible to use the watchdog on a chip whose OTP does
> > not set AUTOBOOT. But anyway, I'm looking forward to hearing from the
> > HW team :)
>
> So I've discussed this internally and so far it's not completely clear how the
> sequence you provided actually performs the reset as you suggest. It certainly
> doesn't look like it should, so maybe this relates to an external pin somehow
> triggering the restart in this particular scenario? I'd be interested to
> understand which event bits are set when the board does restart to understand
> what did actually trigger the boot-up.

After clearing all those registers and a reset as done in this patch,
I get the following values:

FAULT_LOG: 0x00
EVENT_A: 0x10 => As per the datasheet, "Sequencer reached final
position caused event" ?
EVENT_B: 0x00
EVENT_C: 0x00
EVENT_D: 0x00

Do you need any other info?

>
> Regardless of this though, the consensus right now would be to use the RTC as a
> wake event to restart the platform. An alarm can be set for a couple of seconds
> into the future (or longer if required) and that would provide the event
> required to come up from powerdown/shutdown, in the absence of AUTOBOOT being
> set in OTP. I believe this would be the safest route to take in this case. You
> can then just use the SHUTDOWN bit on CONTROL_F to take down the board.
>
> To reiterate, I believe this should be made a board specific quirk, rather than
> as part of the generic MFD core of DA9063, as the timings may vary for other
> platforms.

Alex

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-21  5:33 Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 10:16 ` Anup Patel
2021-09-21 11:20   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-21 10:25 ` Ben Dooks
2021-09-21 11:33   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-23 13:16     ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-24 15:04 ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-24 16:17   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-29 13:33     ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  7:51       ` David Abdurachmanov
2021-09-30  9:28         ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30 10:25         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 12:05           ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-04 15:11             ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-05 13:43               ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-06  9:30                 ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-06 11:35                   ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-08  9:46                     ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-12 10:32                       ` Adam Thomson
2021-10-14 15:51                         ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-10-15  8:47                           ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  9:37       ` Alexandre Ghiti
2021-09-30 10:47         ` Adam Thomson
2021-09-30  9:55       ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2021-10-04 15:29         ` Adam Thomson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+zEjCv8tExoZx309qRMe6KCZ=-AC+nCOV7qivJWE5gCqrd2MA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexandre.ghiti@canonical.com \
    --cc=Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=Support.Opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] drivers: mfd: da9063: Add restart notifier implementation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).