From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752886AbbCKPDm (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:03:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181]:40878 "EHLO mail-ob0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750820AbbCKPDk (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:03:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150311145841.GA30040@sudip-PC> References: <1426070749-32024-1-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> <1426070749-32024-3-git-send-email-lstoakes@gmail.com> <20150311145841.GA30040@sudip-PC> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:03:39 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] staging: sm750fb: Remove spinlock helper function From: Lorenzo Stoakes To: Sudip Mukherjee Cc: teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com, Greg KH , linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11 March 2015 at 14:58, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > tested the whole series on hardware, looks ok. > Great! > now it depends on Greg if he wants to accept patches with such big > commit logs, and another problem he will face is to get some patches from > this thread and some from the old thread. > (while testing i faced this problem to maintain the sequence of > patches) I am more than happy to resend the whole series as necessary if that makes it easier for Greg or anyone else :) I have previously resubmitted an entire patch series only for people to find the v2 resubmits of unchanged code to be confusing. I am absolutely happy to do whatever works for Greg of course! Best, -- Lorenzo Stoakes https:/ljs.io