LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@gmail.com>
To: Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
thomas@weissschuh.net, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Implement custom lock by ACPI mutex.
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 21:33:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB95QAQnU8t4uY17mO9edEd9jktariU_RcZk_1Jdevfr-o0Gnw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125222526.405ce775@netbook-debian>
On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 21:25, Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to propose to leave the current name of the driver and add
> the same logic as in the current patch. So when we know the exact name
> of acpi mutex - code will use such mutex for lock and directly read EC
> memory region. In case if we don't know the exact mutex name/path or for
> some reason ASUS decides to change UEFI code - code will use WMI
> methods. In such a case, adding or checking a new motherboard will
> require only adding a minimal list of well known registers without
> disassembling UEFI code.
>
> What do you think?
Sounds reasonable to me, but nevertheless I think dropping the "wmi"
part from the driver name would make the name clearer with the
proposed functional change.
Best regards,
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-25 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-22 21:28 [PATCH 0/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Support lock by ACPI mutex Denis Pauk
2021-11-22 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Use nct6775_*() lock function pointers in nct6775_data Denis Pauk
2021-11-24 16:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 21:07 ` Denis Pauk
2021-11-25 21:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-22 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: (nct6775) Implement custom lock by ACPI mutex Denis Pauk
2021-11-24 16:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 13:14 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-25 13:16 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-25 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-25 13:54 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-25 13:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 14:00 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-25 19:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-11-25 20:05 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-25 20:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 20:25 ` Denis Pauk
2021-11-25 20:33 ` Eugene Shalygin [this message]
2021-11-25 21:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-25 20:28 ` Eugene Shalygin
2021-11-22 21:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] hwmon: (nct6775) add MAXIMUS VII HERO Denis Pauk
2021-11-24 16:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-24 16:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAB95QAQnU8t4uY17mO9edEd9jktariU_RcZk_1Jdevfr-o0Gnw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eugene.shalygin@gmail.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pauk.denis@gmail.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas@weissschuh.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).