LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
@ 2019-05-23 21:55 Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mikhak @ 2019-05-23 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kishon, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-riscv,
	palmer, paul.walmsley
  Cc: Alan Mikhak

Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().

Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().

Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
---
 drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
 
 static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
 {
-	int bar;
+	int bar, add;
 	int ret;
 	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
 	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
@@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
 
 	epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
 
-	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
+	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
 		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
+		/*
+		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
+		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
+		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
+		 */
+		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
 
 		if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar)))
 			continue;
@@ -413,13 +419,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
 			if (bar == test_reg_bar)
 				return ret;
 		}
-		/*
-		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
-		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
-		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
-		 */
-		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
-			bar++;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
 	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
 	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
 	void *base;
-	int bar;
+	int bar, add;
 	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
 	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
 
@@ -445,8 +444,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
 	}
 	epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
 
-	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
+	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
 		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
+		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
+
 		if (bar == test_reg_bar)
 			continue;
 
@@ -459,8 +460,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
 			dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n",
 				bar);
 		epf_test->reg[bar] = base;
-		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
-			bar++;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.7.4


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-23 21:55 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR Alan Mikhak
@ 2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-24  8:49   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-05-24  8:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mikhak @ 2019-05-23 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kishon, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-riscv,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas, gustavo.pimentel,
	wen.yang99, kjlu

+Bjorn Helgaas, +Gustavo Pimentel, +Wen Yang, +Kangjie Lu

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
>
> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  {
> -       int bar;
> +       int bar, add;
>         int ret;
>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>         struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>
>         epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>
> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +               /*
> +                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> +                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> +                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> +                */
> +               add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
>
>                 if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar)))
>                         continue;
> @@ -413,13 +419,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>                         if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>                                 return ret;
>                 }
> -               /*
> -                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> -                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> -                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> -                */
> -               if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -                       bar++;
>         }
>
>         return 0;
> @@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>         struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>         void *base;
> -       int bar;
> +       int bar, add;
>         enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
>         const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>
> @@ -445,8 +444,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>         }
>         epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
>
> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +               add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
> +
>                 if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>                         continue;
>
> @@ -459,8 +460,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>                         dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n",
>                                 bar);
>                 epf_test->reg[bar] = base;
> -               if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -                       bar++;
>         }
>
>         return 0;
> --
> 2.7.4
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-23 21:55 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
@ 2019-05-24  8:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-06-03  7:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-06-11 10:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I @ 2019-05-24  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak, linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi,
	linux-riscv, palmer, paul.walmsley

Hi,

On 24/05/19 3:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
> 
> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  {
> -	int bar;
> +	int bar, add;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>  	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  	epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>  
> -	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>  		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +		/*
> +		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> +		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> +		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> +		 */

set_bar shouldn't set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64. If a platform supports only
64-bit BAR, that should be specified in epc_features bar_fixed_64bit member.

Thanks
Kishon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
@ 2019-05-24  8:49   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-05-24 18:50     ` Alan Mikhak
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I @ 2019-05-24  8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak, linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi,
	linux-riscv, Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas,
	gustavo.pimentel, wen.yang99, kjlu

Hi,

On 24/05/19 5:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> +Bjorn Helgaas, +Gustavo Pimentel, +Wen Yang, +Kangjie Lu
> 
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com> wrote:
>>
>> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
>> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
>>
>> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
>> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
>> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
>> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>
>>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>  {
>> -       int bar;
>> +       int bar, add;
>>         int ret;
>>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>>         struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
>> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>
>>         epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>>
>> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
>> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
>> +               /*
>> +                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
>> +                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
>> +                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
>> +                */

set_bar shouldn't set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64. If a platform supports only
64-bit BAR, that should be specified in epc_features bar_fixed_64bit member.

Thanks
Kishon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-24  8:49   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
@ 2019-05-24 18:50     ` Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-30 16:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
  2019-05-31  4:35       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mikhak @ 2019-05-24 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-riscv,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas, gustavo.pimentel,
	wen.yang99, kjlu

Hi Kishon,

Yes. This change is still applicable even when the platform specifies
that it only supports 64-bit BARs by setting the bar_fixed_64bit
member of epc_features.

The issue being fixed is this: If the 'continue' statement is executed
within the loop, the loop index 'bar' needs to advanced by two, not
one, when the BAR is 64-bit. Otherwise the next loop iteration will be
on an odd BAR which doesn't exist.

The PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 flag in epf_bar->flag reflects the
value set by the platform in the bar_fixed_64bit member of
epc_features.

This patch moves the checking of  PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in
epf_bar->flags to before the 'continue' statement to advance the 'bar'
loop index accordingly. The comment you see about 'pci_epc_set_bar()'
preceding the moved code is the original comment and was also moved
along with the code.

Regards,
Alan Mikhak

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 24/05/19 5:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> > +Bjorn Helgaas, +Gustavo Pimentel, +Wen Yang, +Kangjie Lu
> >
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> >> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
> >>
> >> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> >> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> >> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> >> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> >> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> >> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> >>
> >>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> >>  {
> >> -       int bar;
> >> +       int bar, add;
> >>         int ret;
> >>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> >>         struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> >> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> >>
> >>         epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
> >>
> >> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> >> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
> >>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> >> +               /*
> >> +                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> >> +                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> >> +                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> >> +                */
>
> set_bar shouldn't set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64. If a platform supports only
> 64-bit BAR, that should be specified in epc_features bar_fixed_64bit member.
>
> Thanks
> Kishon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-24 18:50     ` Alan Mikhak
@ 2019-05-30 16:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
  2019-05-31  4:35       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2019-05-30 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak
  Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I, linux-pci, linux-kernel, linux-riscv,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas, gustavo.pimentel,
	wen.yang99, kjlu

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:50:41AM -0700, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> Yes. This change is still applicable even when the platform specifies
> that it only supports 64-bit BARs by setting the bar_fixed_64bit
> member of epc_features.
> 
> The issue being fixed is this: If the 'continue' statement is executed
> within the loop, the loop index 'bar' needs to advanced by two, not
> one, when the BAR is 64-bit. Otherwise the next loop iteration will be
> on an odd BAR which doesn't exist.
> 
> The PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 flag in epf_bar->flag reflects the
> value set by the platform in the bar_fixed_64bit member of
> epc_features.
> 
> This patch moves the checking of  PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in
> epf_bar->flags to before the 'continue' statement to advance the 'bar'
> loop index accordingly. The comment you see about 'pci_epc_set_bar()'
> preceding the moved code is the original comment and was also moved
> along with the code.

@Kishon, I would need your ACK to merge this patch.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

> Regards,
> Alan Mikhak
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 24/05/19 5:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> > > +Bjorn Helgaas, +Gustavo Pimentel, +Wen Yang, +Kangjie Lu
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> > >> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
> > >>
> > >> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> > >> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> > >> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> > >> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> > >> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> > >> ---
> > >>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> > >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > >> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> > >> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > >> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> > >> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >>
> > >>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >>  {
> > >> -       int bar;
> > >> +       int bar, add;
> > >>         int ret;
> > >>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
> > >>         struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> > >> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
> > >>
> > >>         epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
> > >>
> > >> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> > >> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
> > >>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> > >> +               /*
> > >> +                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> > >> +                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> > >> +                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> > >> +                */
> >
> > set_bar shouldn't set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64. If a platform supports only
> > 64-bit BAR, that should be specified in epc_features bar_fixed_64bit member.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Kishon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-24 18:50     ` Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-30 16:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
@ 2019-05-31  4:35       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-05-31 16:52         ` Alan Mikhak
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I @ 2019-05-31  4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-riscv,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas, gustavo.pimentel,
	wen.yang99, kjlu

Hi Alan,

On 25/05/19 12:20 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> Yes. This change is still applicable even when the platform specifies
> that it only supports 64-bit BARs by setting the bar_fixed_64bit
> member of epc_features.
> 
> The issue being fixed is this: If the 'continue' statement is executed
> within the loop, the loop index 'bar' needs to advanced by two, not
> one, when the BAR is 64-bit. Otherwise the next loop iteration will be
> on an odd BAR which doesn't exist.

IIUC you are fixing the case where the BAR is "reserved" (specified in
epc_features) and is also a 64-bit BAR?

If 2 consecutive BARs are marked as reserved in reserved_bar of epc_features,
the result should be the same right?

Thanks
Kishon

> 
> The PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 flag in epf_bar->flag reflects the
> value set by the platform in the bar_fixed_64bit member of
> epc_features.
> 
> This patch moves the checking of  PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64 in
> epf_bar->flags to before the 'continue' statement to advance the 'bar'
> loop index accordingly. The comment you see about 'pci_epc_set_bar()'
> preceding the moved code is the original comment and was also moved
> along with the code.
> 
> Regards,
> Alan Mikhak
> 
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 1:51 AM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 24/05/19 5:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
>>> +Bjorn Helgaas, +Gustavo Pimentel, +Wen Yang, +Kangjie Lu
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 2:55 PM Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
>>>> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
>>>> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
>>>> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
>>>> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>>>> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>>>> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>>
>>>>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>>  {
>>>> -       int bar;
>>>> +       int bar, add;
>>>>         int ret;
>>>>         struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>>>>         struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
>>>> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>>>>
>>>>         epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>>>>
>>>> -       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
>>>> +       for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>>>>                 epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
>>>> +               /*
>>>> +                * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
>>>> +                * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
>>>> +                * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
>>>> +                */
>>
>> set_bar shouldn't set PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64. If a platform supports only
>> 64-bit BAR, that should be specified in epc_features bar_fixed_64bit member.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Kishon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-31  4:35       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
@ 2019-05-31 16:52         ` Alan Mikhak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mikhak @ 2019-05-31 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi, linux-riscv,
	Palmer Dabbelt, Paul Walmsley, Bjorn Helgaas, Gustavo Pimentel,
	wen.yang99, kjlu

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 9:37 PM Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> On 25/05/19 12:20 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> > Hi Kishon,
> >
> > Yes. This change is still applicable even when the platform specifies
> > that it only supports 64-bit BARs by setting the bar_fixed_64bit
> > member of epc_features.
> >
> > The issue being fixed is this: If the 'continue' statement is executed
> > within the loop, the loop index 'bar' needs to advanced by two, not
> > one, when the BAR is 64-bit. Otherwise the next loop iteration will be
> > on an odd BAR which doesn't exist.
>
> IIUC you are fixing the case where the BAR is "reserved" (specified in
> epc_features) and is also a 64-bit BAR?

Correct. If BAR0 is specified in epc_features as reserved and also
64-bit, the loop would skip BAR0 by executing the 'continue'
statement. In this scenario, BAR1 doesn't exist since the 64-bit BAR0
spans the two 32-bit BAR0 and BAR1. The loop index 'bar' would be
advanced by 2 in this case so on the next iteration the loop would
process BAR2.

> If 2 consecutive BARs are marked as reserved in reserved_bar of epc_features,
> the result should be the same right?

If both BAR0 and BAR2 are reserved and also 64-bit, the loop would
check BAR0 on its first iteration and skip BAR0 and BAR1, check BAR2
on its second iteration and skip BAR2 and BAR3, then check BAR4 on its
third iteration. If BAR4 is also 64-bit and reserved, the loop would
skip BAR4 and BAR5 and that would be the final iteration of the loop.

Regards,
Alan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-23 21:55 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
  2019-05-24  8:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
@ 2019-06-03  7:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
  2019-06-11 10:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I @ 2019-06-03  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak, linux-pci, linux-kernel, lorenzo.pieralisi,
	linux-riscv, palmer, paul.walmsley



On 24/05/19 3:25 AM, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
> 
> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>

Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  {
> -	int bar;
> +	int bar, add;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>  	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  	epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>  
> -	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>  		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +		/*
> +		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> +		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> +		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> +		 */
> +		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
>  
>  		if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar)))
>  			continue;
> @@ -413,13 +419,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  			if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>  				return ret;
>  		}
> -		/*
> -		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> -		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> -		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> -		 */
> -		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -			bar++;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
>  	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>  	void *base;
> -	int bar;
> +	int bar, add;
>  	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
>  	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>  
> @@ -445,8 +444,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	}
>  	epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
>  
> -	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>  		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
> +
>  		if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -459,8 +460,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  			dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n",
>  				bar);
>  		epf_test->reg[bar] = base;
> -		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -			bar++;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR
  2019-05-23 21:55 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR Alan Mikhak
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2019-06-03  7:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
@ 2019-06-11 10:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi @ 2019-06-11 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Mikhak
  Cc: linux-pci, linux-kernel, kishon, linux-riscv, palmer, paul.walmsley

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 02:55:40PM -0700, Alan Mikhak wrote:
> Always skip odd bar when skipping 64bit BARs in pci_epf_test_set_bar()
> and pci_epf_test_alloc_space().
> 
> Otherwise, pci_epf_test_set_bar() will call pci_epc_set_bar() on odd loop
> index when skipping reserved 64bit BAR. Moreover, pci_epf_test_alloc_space()
> will call pci_epf_alloc_space() on bind for odd loop index when BAR is 64bit
> but leaks on subsequent unbind by not calling pci_epf_free_space().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Mikhak <alan.mikhak@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

Applied to pci/endpoint for v5.3, thanks.

Lorenzo

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index 27806987e93b..96156a537922 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_unbind(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  {
> -	int bar;
> +	int bar, add;
>  	int ret;
>  	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>  	struct pci_epc *epc = epf->epc;
> @@ -400,8 +400,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  
>  	epc_features = epf_test->epc_features;
>  
> -	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>  		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +		/*
> +		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> +		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> +		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> +		 */
> +		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
>  
>  		if (!!(epc_features->reserved_bar & (1 << bar)))
>  			continue;
> @@ -413,13 +419,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_set_bar(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  			if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>  				return ret;
>  		}
> -		/*
> -		 * pci_epc_set_bar() sets PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64
> -		 * if the specific implementation required a 64-bit BAR,
> -		 * even if we only requested a 32-bit BAR.
> -		 */
> -		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -			bar++;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -431,7 +430,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	struct device *dev = &epf->dev;
>  	struct pci_epf_bar *epf_bar;
>  	void *base;
> -	int bar;
> +	int bar, add;
>  	enum pci_barno test_reg_bar = epf_test->test_reg_bar;
>  	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
>  
> @@ -445,8 +444,10 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  	}
>  	epf_test->reg[test_reg_bar] = base;
>  
> -	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) {
> +	for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar += add) {
>  		epf_bar = &epf->bar[bar];
> +		add = (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64) ? 2 : 1;
> +
>  		if (bar == test_reg_bar)
>  			continue;
>  
> @@ -459,8 +460,6 @@ static int pci_epf_test_alloc_space(struct pci_epf *epf)
>  			dev_err(dev, "Failed to allocate space for BAR%d\n",
>  				bar);
>  		epf_test->reg[bar] = base;
> -		if (epf_bar->flags & PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_TYPE_64)
> -			bar++;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-11 10:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-23 21:55 [PATCH v2] PCI: endpoint: Skip odd BAR when skipping 64bit BAR Alan Mikhak
2019-05-23 23:55 ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-24  8:49   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-05-24 18:50     ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-30 16:22       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2019-05-31  4:35       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-05-31 16:52         ` Alan Mikhak
2019-05-24  8:49 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-03  7:34 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2019-06-11 10:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).