LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
@ 2021-08-24 12:20 Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-08-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, joro, jroedel
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Hi,
here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
the code as a preparation for patch 4.
The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
error handling in negotiate_os_control().
I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
found no regressions on my test machine.
Please review.
Thanks,
Joerg
Joerg Roedel (4):
PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS
PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten
functions
PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function
PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
include/linux/acpi.h | 2 -
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-08-24 12:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions Joerg Roedel
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-08-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, joro, jroedel, Bjorn Helgaas
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
These masks are only used internally in the PCI Host Bridge _OSC
negotiation code, which already makes sure nothing outside of these
masks is set. Remove the masks and simplify the code.
Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgass@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 9 +++------
include/linux/acpi.h | 2 --
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index d7deedf3548e..0c3030a58219 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -199,18 +199,15 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
acpi_status status;
u32 result, capbuf[3];
- support &= OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS;
support |= root->osc_support_set;
capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
- if (control) {
- *control &= OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
+ if (control)
capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
- } else {
+ else
/* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
- }
status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
@@ -357,7 +354,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
if (!mask)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
- ctrl = *mask & OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
+ ctrl = *mask;
if ((ctrl & req) != req)
return AE_TYPE;
diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
index 72e4f7fd268c..c6dba5f21384 100644
--- a/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ extern u32 osc_sb_native_usb4_control;
#define OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT 0x00000010
#define OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT 0x00000080
#define OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT 0x00000100
-#define OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS 0x0000019f
/* PCI Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 3: Control Field */
#define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL 0x00000001
@@ -587,7 +586,6 @@ extern u32 osc_sb_native_usb4_control;
#define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL 0x00000010
#define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL 0x00000020
#define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL 0x00000080
-#define OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS 0x000000bf
#define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_QUICK 0x00000002
#define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_SEND_RCV 0x00000004
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-08-24 12:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function Joerg Roedel
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-08-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, joro, jroedel
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Move the calculations of supported and controled _OSC features out of
negotiate_os_control into separate functions.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index 0c3030a58219..ed4e6b55e9bc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -396,6 +396,59 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
return AE_OK;
}
+static u32 calculate_support(void)
+{
+ u32 support;
+
+ /*
+ * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
+ * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
+ */
+ support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
+ support |= OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT;
+ if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
+ support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
+ if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled())
+ support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
+ if (pci_msi_enabled())
+ support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
+ support |= OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT;
+
+ return support;
+}
+
+static u32 calculate_control(void)
+{
+ u32 control;
+
+ control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
+ | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
+ control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
+
+ if (pci_aer_available())
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
+
+ /*
+ * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
+ * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
+ * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
+ * and EDR.
+ */
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
+ control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
+
+ return control;
+}
+
static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
bool is_pcie)
{
@@ -416,20 +469,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
return;
}
- /*
- * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
- * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
- */
- support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
- support |= OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT;
- if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
- support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
- if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled())
- support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
- if (pci_msi_enabled())
- support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
- support |= OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT;
+ support = calculate_support();
decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
@@ -456,31 +496,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
return;
}
- control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
- | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
- control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
- control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
-
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
- control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
-
- if (pci_aer_available())
- control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
-
- /*
- * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
- * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
- * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
- * and EDR.
- */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
- control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
+ requested = control = calculate_control();
- requested = control;
status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-08-24 12:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Joerg Roedel
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-08-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, joro, jroedel
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Move the checks about whether the _OSC controls are requested from the
firmware to a separate function.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index ed4e6b55e9bc..f12e512bcddc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -449,6 +449,24 @@ static u32 calculate_control(void)
return control;
}
+static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
+{
+ struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
+
+ if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
+ dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
+ decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
+ ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
bool is_pcie)
{
@@ -485,16 +503,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
return;
}
- if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
- dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
+ if (!os_control_query_checks(root, support))
return;
- }
-
- if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
- decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
- ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
- return;
- }
requested = control = calculate_control();
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-08-24 12:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-01 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-08-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown
Cc: linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, joro, jroedel
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Get rid of acpi_pci_osc_support() and check for _OSC supported features
directly in acpi_pci_osc_control_set(). There is no point in doing an
unconditional _OSC query with control=0 even when the kernel later wants
to take control over more features.
This safes one _OSC query and simplifies the code by getting rid of
the acpi_pci_osc_support() function. As a side effect, the !control
checks in acpi_pci_query_osc() can also be removed.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index f12e512bcddc..ab2f7dfb0c44 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -203,26 +203,16 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
- if (control)
- capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
- else
- /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
- capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
+ capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
root->osc_support_set = support;
- if (control)
- *control = result;
+ *control = result;
}
return status;
}
-static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_support(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 flags)
-{
- return acpi_pci_query_osc(root, flags, NULL);
-}
-
struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle)
{
struct acpi_pci_root *root;
@@ -345,8 +335,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_dev);
* _OSC bits the BIOS has granted control of, but its contents are meaningless
* on failure.
**/
-static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 req)
+static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 support)
{
+ u32 req = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL;
struct acpi_pci_root *root;
acpi_status status;
u32 ctrl, capbuf[3];
@@ -354,22 +345,16 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
if (!mask)
return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
- ctrl = *mask;
- if ((ctrl & req) != req)
- return AE_TYPE;
-
root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
if (!root)
return AE_NOT_EXIST;
- *mask = ctrl | root->osc_control_set;
- /* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */
- if ((root->osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
- return AE_OK;
+ ctrl = *mask;
+ *mask |= root->osc_control_set;
/* Need to check the available controls bits before requesting them. */
- while (*mask) {
- status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set, mask);
+ do {
+ status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, support, mask);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
if (ctrl == *mask)
@@ -377,7 +362,11 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
decode_osc_control(root, "platform does not support",
ctrl & ~(*mask));
ctrl = *mask;
- }
+ } while (*mask);
+
+ /* No need to request _OSC if the control was already granted. */
+ if ((root->osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
+ return AE_OK;
if ((ctrl & req) != req) {
decode_osc_control(root, "not requesting control; platform does not support",
@@ -470,7 +459,7 @@ static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
bool is_pcie)
{
- u32 support, control, requested;
+ u32 support, control = 0, requested = 0;
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
@@ -490,28 +479,15 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
support = calculate_support();
decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
- status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- *no_aspm = 1;
-
- /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
- if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
- return;
-
- dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
- return;
- }
-
- if (!os_control_query_checks(root, support))
- return;
- requested = control = calculate_control();
+ if (os_control_query_checks(root, support))
+ requested = control = calculate_control();
- status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
- OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
+ status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control, support);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
- decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
+ if (control)
+ decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
+
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
/*
* We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates that
@@ -522,11 +498,6 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
*no_aspm = 1;
}
} else {
- decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
- decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
- dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
-
/*
* We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
* needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
@@ -535,6 +506,18 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
* root scan.
*/
*no_aspm = 1;
+
+ /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
+ if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
+ return;
+
+ if (control) {
+ decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
+ decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
+ }
+
+ dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
}
}
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-01 18:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-01 18:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel,
Bjorn Helgaas
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> These masks are only used internally in the PCI Host Bridge _OSC
> negotiation code, which already makes sure nothing outside of these
> masks is set. Remove the masks and simplify the code.
>
> Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <helgass@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 9 +++------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index d7deedf3548e..0c3030a58219 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -199,18 +199,15 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> acpi_status status;
> u32 result, capbuf[3];
>
> - support &= OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS;
> support |= root->osc_support_set;
>
> capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
> capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
> - if (control) {
> - *control &= OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
> + if (control)
> capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
> - } else {
> + else
> /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
> - }
>
> status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> @@ -357,7 +354,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
> if (!mask)
> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
>
> - ctrl = *mask & OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
> + ctrl = *mask;
> if ((ctrl & req) != req)
> return AE_TYPE;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h
> index 72e4f7fd268c..c6dba5f21384 100644
> --- a/include/linux/acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h
> @@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ extern u32 osc_sb_native_usb4_control;
> #define OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT 0x00000010
> #define OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT 0x00000080
> #define OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT 0x00000100
> -#define OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS 0x0000019f
>
> /* PCI Host Bridge _OSC: Capabilities DWORD 3: Control Field */
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL 0x00000001
> @@ -587,7 +586,6 @@ extern u32 osc_sb_native_usb4_control;
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL 0x00000010
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL 0x00000020
> #define OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL 0x00000080
> -#define OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS 0x000000bf
>
> #define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_QUICK 0x00000002
> #define ACPI_GSB_ACCESS_ATTRIB_SEND_RCV 0x00000004
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-01 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-01 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Move the calculations of supported and controled _OSC features out of
> negotiate_os_control into separate functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 0c3030a58219..ed4e6b55e9bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -396,6 +396,59 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> +static u32 calculate_support(void)
> +{
> + u32 support;
> +
> + /*
> + * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> + * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
> + */
> + support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
> + support |= OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT;
> + if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
> + support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
> + if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled())
> + support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
> + if (pci_msi_enabled())
> + support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> + support |= OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT;
> +
> + return support;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 calculate_control(void)
> +{
> + u32 control;
> +
> + control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
> + | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
> + control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> + control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
> + control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> +
> + if (pci_aer_available())
> + control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> + * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
> + * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
> + * and EDR.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> + control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> +
> + return control;
> +}
> +
> static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> bool is_pcie)
> {
> @@ -416,20 +469,7 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> return;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * All supported architectures that use ACPI have support for
> - * PCI domains, so we indicate this in _OSC support capabilities.
> - */
> - support = OSC_PCI_SEGMENT_GROUPS_SUPPORT;
> - support |= OSC_PCI_HPX_TYPE_3_SUPPORT;
> - if (pci_ext_cfg_avail())
> - support |= OSC_PCI_EXT_CONFIG_SUPPORT;
> - if (pcie_aspm_support_enabled())
> - support |= OSC_PCI_ASPM_SUPPORT | OSC_PCI_CLOCK_PM_SUPPORT;
> - if (pci_msi_enabled())
> - support |= OSC_PCI_MSI_SUPPORT;
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> - support |= OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT;
> + support = calculate_support();
>
> decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
> status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
> @@ -456,31 +496,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> return;
> }
>
> - control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
> - | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
> - control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> - control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> -
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
> - control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> -
> - if (pci_aer_available())
> - control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> -
> - /*
> - * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> - * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
> - * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
> - * and EDR.
> - */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> - control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> + requested = control = calculate_control();
>
> - requested = control;
> status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
> OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-01 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-01 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Move the checks about whether the _OSC controls are requested from the
> firmware to a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index ed4e6b55e9bc..f12e512bcddc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -449,6 +449,24 @@ static u32 calculate_control(void)
> return control;
> }
>
> +static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
> +
> + if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
> + dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
> + decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
> + ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> bool is_pcie)
> {
> @@ -485,16 +503,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
> - dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
> + if (!os_control_query_checks(root, support))
> return;
> - }
> -
> - if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
> - decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
> - ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
> - return;
> - }
>
> requested = control = calculate_control();
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-01 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-01 19:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Get rid of acpi_pci_osc_support() and check for _OSC supported features
> directly in acpi_pci_osc_control_set(). There is no point in doing an
> unconditional _OSC query with control=0 even when the kernel later wants
> to take control over more features.
>
> This safes one _OSC query and simplifies the code by getting rid of
s/safes/saves/
> the acpi_pci_osc_support() function. As a side effect, the !control
> checks in acpi_pci_query_osc() can also be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Apart from the typo above, I haven't found any issues in the patch, so
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index f12e512bcddc..ab2f7dfb0c44 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -203,26 +203,16 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>
> capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
> capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
> - if (control)
> - capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
> - else
> - /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> - capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
> + capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
>
> status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> root->osc_support_set = support;
> - if (control)
> - *control = result;
> + *control = result;
> }
> return status;
> }
>
> -static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_support(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 flags)
> -{
> - return acpi_pci_query_osc(root, flags, NULL);
> -}
> -
> struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle)
> {
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> @@ -345,8 +335,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_dev);
> * _OSC bits the BIOS has granted control of, but its contents are meaningless
> * on failure.
> **/
> -static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 req)
> +static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 support)
> {
> + u32 req = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL;
> struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> acpi_status status;
> u32 ctrl, capbuf[3];
> @@ -354,22 +345,16 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
> if (!mask)
> return AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
>
> - ctrl = *mask;
> - if ((ctrl & req) != req)
> - return AE_TYPE;
> -
> root = acpi_pci_find_root(handle);
> if (!root)
> return AE_NOT_EXIST;
>
> - *mask = ctrl | root->osc_control_set;
> - /* No need to evaluate _OSC if the control was already granted. */
> - if ((root->osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
> - return AE_OK;
> + ctrl = *mask;
> + *mask |= root->osc_control_set;
>
> /* Need to check the available controls bits before requesting them. */
> - while (*mask) {
> - status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set, mask);
> + do {
> + status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, support, mask);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> return status;
> if (ctrl == *mask)
> @@ -377,7 +362,11 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
> decode_osc_control(root, "platform does not support",
> ctrl & ~(*mask));
> ctrl = *mask;
> - }
> + } while (*mask);
> +
> + /* No need to request _OSC if the control was already granted. */
> + if ((root->osc_control_set & ctrl) == ctrl)
> + return AE_OK;
>
> if ((ctrl & req) != req) {
> decode_osc_control(root, "not requesting control; platform does not support",
> @@ -470,7 +459,7 @@ static bool os_control_query_checks(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 support)
> static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> bool is_pcie)
> {
> - u32 support, control, requested;
> + u32 support, control = 0, requested = 0;
> acpi_status status;
> struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
> acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> @@ -490,28 +479,15 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> support = calculate_support();
>
> decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
> - status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - *no_aspm = 1;
> -
> - /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
> - if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
> - return;
> -
> - dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> - acpi_format_exception(status));
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - if (!os_control_query_checks(root, support))
> - return;
>
> - requested = control = calculate_control();
> + if (os_control_query_checks(root, support))
> + requested = control = calculate_control();
>
> - status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
> - OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
> + status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control, support);
> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> - decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
> + if (control)
> + decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
> +
> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
> /*
> * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates that
> @@ -522,11 +498,6 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> *no_aspm = 1;
> }
> } else {
> - decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
> - decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
> - dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> - acpi_format_exception(status));
> -
> /*
> * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
> * needs to remain in its state from boot so that we
> @@ -535,6 +506,18 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
> * root scan.
> */
> *no_aspm = 1;
> +
> + /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
> + if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
> + return;
> +
> + if (control) {
> + decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
> + decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> + acpi_format_exception(status));
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-01 19:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-01 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
> negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
>
> This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
> previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
> the code as a preparation for patch 4.
>
> The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
> support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
>
> This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
> error handling in negotiate_os_control().
>
> I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
> found no regressions on my test machine.
I have reviewed the patches, so if you want me to queue up this
series, please let me know.
Thanks,
Rafael
> Joerg Roedel (4):
> PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS
> PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten
> functions
> PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function
> PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-09-01 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-09-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-14 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-09-13 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 9:33 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 2:21 PM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
> > negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
> >
> > This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
> > previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
> > the code as a preparation for patch 4.
> >
> > The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
> > support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
> >
> > This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
> > error handling in negotiate_os_control().
> >
> > I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
> > found no regressions on my test machine.
>
> I have reviewed the patches, so if you want me to queue up this
> series, please let me know.
Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-09-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-09-14 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-14 13:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-09-14 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas
Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, Linux PCI, ACPI Devel Maling List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Joerg Roedel
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?
No idea, checking git-log on the file shows mixed Signed-off-bys from
both of you. Bjorn?
Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-09-14 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
@ 2021-09-14 13:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-09-14 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown,
Linux PCI, ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Joerg Roedel
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:50 AM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Should I assume that Bjorn will be taking it?
>
> No idea, checking git-log on the file shows mixed Signed-off-bys from
> both of you. Bjorn?
I'll merge it, hopefully this week. Thanks!
Bjorn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-09-01 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29 8:09 ` Joerg Roedel
5 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Bjorn Helgaas @ 2021-09-28 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown, linux-pci,
linux-acpi, linux-kernel, jroedel
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 02:20:50PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> Hi,
>
> here is the third version of my patches to simplify the _OSC
> negotiation of PCIe features between Linux and the firmware.
>
> This version is a complete rewrite, so there is no changelog to the
> previous version. Patches 1-3 are cleanups and small restructurings of
> the code as a preparation for patch 4.
>
> The last patch gets rid of the dedicated _OSC query to check for _OSC
> support and merges that functionality into acpi_pci_osc_control_set().
>
> This allows to simplify and/or remove other functions and consilidate
> error handling in negotiate_os_control().
>
> I have tested the patches with and without 'pcie_ports=compat' and
> found no regressions on my test machine.
>
> Please review.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joerg
>
>
>
> Joerg Roedel (4):
> PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS
> PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten
> functions
> PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function
> PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> include/linux/acpi.h | 2 -
> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
Applied with Rafael's reviewed-by to pci/acpi for v5.16, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation
2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
@ 2021-09-29 8:09 ` Joerg Roedel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2021-09-29 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bjorn Helgaas
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael J . Wysocki, Len Brown,
linux-pci, linux-acpi, linux-kernel
On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 04:21:19PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Applied with Rafael's reviewed-by to pci/acpi for v5.16, thanks!
Thanks Bjorn!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-29 8:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-08-24 12:20 [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] PCI/ACPI: Move supported and control calculations to separaten functions Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] PCI/ACPI: Move _OSC query checks to separate function Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-08-24 12:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set() Joerg Roedel
2021-09-01 19:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-01 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-13 16:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-09-14 13:49 ` Joerg Roedel
2021-09-14 13:52 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-28 21:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-29 8:09 ` Joerg Roedel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).