LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
To: evgreen@chromium.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	gwendal@chromium.org, asavery@chromium.org,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 10:55:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVXFVN63UDefvBnYTQ==tWwYqGJbCS_HK==-1jVa5sVc=-Upw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE=gft5XZD-GQYwcv4YWHrDSWRqT7SDpWXzv7c6MKAAH7uGr2Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 2:55 AM Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:06 PM Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > If the backing device for a loop device is a block device,

This shouldn't be a very common use case wrt. loop.

> > then mirror the discard properties of the underlying block
> > device into the loop device. While in there, differentiate
> > between REQ_OP_DISCARD and REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES, which are
> > different for block devices, but which the loop device had
> > just been lumping together.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
>
> Any thoughts on this patch? This fixes issues for us when using a loop
> device backed by a block device, where we see many logs like:
>
> [  372.767286] print_req_error: I/O error, dev loop5, sector 88125696

Seems not see any explanation about this IO error and the fix in your patch.
Could you describe it a bit more?


thanks,
Ming Lei

  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-27  2:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-30 23:06 [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard " Evan Green
2018-10-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] loop: Report EOPNOTSUPP properly Evan Green
2018-11-28  1:06   ` Ming Lei
2018-10-30 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices Evan Green
2018-11-26 18:53   ` Evan Green
2018-11-27  2:55     ` Ming Lei [this message]
2018-11-27 23:34       ` Evan Green
2018-11-28  1:28         ` Ming Lei
2018-11-28  1:26   ` Ming Lei
2018-12-04 22:19     ` Evan Green
2018-12-05  1:10       ` Ming Lei
2018-12-05 19:35         ` Evan Green
2018-12-06  0:22           ` Ming Lei
2018-12-06  3:15           ` Martin K. Petersen
2018-12-10 17:31             ` Evan Green
2018-12-18 23:48               ` Evan Green
2018-10-30 23:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] loop: Better discard " Bart Van Assche
2018-11-01 18:15   ` Evan Green
2018-11-01 22:44     ` Gwendal Grignou
2018-11-02 16:02       ` Bart Van Assche
2018-11-05 20:35         ` Evan Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACVXFVN63UDefvBnYTQ==tWwYqGJbCS_HK==-1jVa5sVc=-Upw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    --cc=asavery@chromium.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=evgreen@chromium.org \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 2/2] loop: Better discard support for block devices' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).