LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	swhiteho@redhat.com, cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: record task name which froze superblock
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:42:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACVxJT9E7Z5Q4=F1bOEXiZ4rrWFrm5_X0Hcj-oHP-Jach8gBXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150218091323.GA4614@quack.suse.cz>

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> On Wed 18-02-15 10:34:55, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 10:38:52AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
>> > On Sat 14-02-15 21:55:24, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>> > > Freezing and thawing are separate system calls, task which is supposed
>> > > to thaw filesystem/superblock can disappear due to crash or not thaw
>> > > due to a bug. Record at least task name (we can't take task_struct
>> > > reference) to make support engineer's life easier.
>> > >
>> > > Hopefully 16 bytes per superblock isn't much.
>> > >
>> > > P.S.: Cc'ing GFS2 people just in case they want to correct
>> > > my understanding of GFS2 having async freeze code.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
>> >   Hum, and when do you show the task name? Or do you expect that customer
>> > takes a crashdump and support just finds it in memory?
>>
>> Yeah, having at least something in crashdump is fine.
>   OK, then comment about this at freeze_comm[] definition so that it's
> clear it isn't just set-but-never-read field.

OK.

>> > > --- a/fs/ioctl.c
>> > > +++ b/fs/ioctl.c
>> > > @@ -518,6 +518,7 @@ static int ioctl_fioasync(unsigned int fd, struct file *filp,
>> > >  static int ioctl_fsfreeze(struct file *filp)
>> > >  {
>> > >   struct super_block *sb = file_inode(filp)->i_sb;
>> > > + int rv;
>> > >
>> > >   if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> > >           return -EPERM;
>> > > @@ -527,22 +528,31 @@ static int ioctl_fsfreeze(struct file *filp)
>> > >           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> > >
>> > >   /* Freeze */
>> > > - if (sb->s_op->freeze_super)
>> > > -         return sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb);
>> > > - return freeze_super(sb);
>> > > + if (sb->s_op->freeze_super) {
>> > > +         rv = sb->s_op->freeze_super(sb);
>> > > +         if (rv == 0)
>> > > +                 get_task_comm(sb->s_writers.freeze_comm, current);
>> > > + } else
>> > > +         rv = freeze_super(sb);
>> > > + return rv;
>> >   Why don't you just set the name in ioctl_fsfreeze() in both cases?
>>
>> There are users of freeze_super() in GFS2 unless I'm misreading code.
>   Yes, there are. The call in fs/gfs2/glops.c is in a call path from
> ->freeze_super() handler for GFS2 so that one is handled in
> ioctl_fsfreeze() anyway. The call in fs/gfs2/sys.c is a way to freeze
> filesystem via sysfs (dunno why GFS2 has to invent its own thing and ioctl
> isn't enough). Steven? So having the logic in ioctl_fsfreeze(),
> freeze_bdev() and freeze_store() in gfs2 seems to be enough.

Jan, my logic is as follows.

Recording freezer task name is not filesystem/device specific and
thus should be done in generic code. So no changes in GFS2.

freeze_super() is generic counterpart to filesystem/device
specific ->freeze_super() hook, look how they are paired.
It should recore freezer task name, so any future user
will not forget to do the same.

So it's in ioctl_fsfreeze(), freeze_bdev() and freeze_super().

>> > > --- a/include/linux/fs.h
>> > > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
>> > > @@ -1221,6 +1221,8 @@ struct sb_writers {
>> > >   int                     frozen;         /* Is sb frozen? */
>> > >   wait_queue_head_t       wait_unfrozen;  /* queue for waiting for
>> > >                                              sb to be thawed */
>> > > + /* who froze superblock */
>> > > + char                    freeze_comm[16];
>> >   Here should be TASK_COMM_LEN, shouldn't it?
>>
>> It will pull sched.h, dunno if we care about headers anymore.
>   That's not ideal but IMHO better than having the value hardcoded here.
> That is pretty fragile - i.e. think what happens when someone decides to
> increase TASK_COMM_LEN...

TASK_COMM_LEN is userspace ABI via at least prctl(PR_SET_NAME).
I can formally move it to include/uapi/linux/sched.h.
This allows to not drag sched.h into fs.h for one tiny define.

    Alexey

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-20 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-14 18:55 Alexey Dobriyan
2015-02-16  9:38 ` Jan Kara
2015-02-18  7:34   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-02-18  7:36     ` [PATCH v2] " Alexey Dobriyan
2015-02-18  9:13     ` [PATCH] " Jan Kara
2015-02-18 10:18       ` Steven Whitehouse
2015-02-20 11:42       ` Alexey Dobriyan [this message]
2015-02-20 12:15         ` Jan Kara
2015-02-28 14:22           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-02-28 14:25             ` [PATCH v3] " Alexey Dobriyan
2015-02-28 21:31               ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-02  4:38                 ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-03-02  4:46                   ` Mateusz Guzik
2015-03-09 15:14                     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2015-03-02 21:33                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-03-04 15:14                   ` Alexey Dobriyan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACVxJT9E7Z5Q4=F1bOEXiZ4rrWFrm5_X0Hcj-oHP-Jach8gBXw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] fs: record task name which froze superblock' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).