LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <>
To: Thomas Gleixner <>,
	LKML <>,
	Jonathan Corbet <>,
Cc: Linus Torvalds <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Kate Stewart <>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>,
	Russell King <>,
	Rob Herring <>,
	Jonas Oberg <>, Joe Perches <>,,
	Kate Stewart <>,
	Florian Fainelli <>
Subject: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2018 23:25:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)


Due to some maintainers *preferring* BSD-compatible license for DTS
files [0], I was writing mine using ISC. I had no very special reason
for it: I was choosing between BSD-2-Clause, MIT and ISC. I've chosen
ISC as I read about its "removal of language deemed unnecessary".

I took a moment to look at the new SPDX thing and noticed that:
1) File license-rules.rst provides "LICENSES/other/ISC" as an example
2) License file LICENSES/other/ISC doesn't exist
3) ISC is listed as an *example* under the "Not recommended licenses"

First of all, as ISC is used by some files in the Linux kernel, I
think it's worth adding to the LICENSE/*/ISC.

Secondly, it isn't 100% clear to me if ISC is preferred or not
recommended. File license-rules.rst suggests the later by listing it
as an example for "Not recommended". It's just an example though, so
I'm not 100% sure without seeing it in either: "preferred" or "other"
directories. Also if anyone finds it "Not recommended", can we get a
short explanation why is it so, please?



             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-28 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-28 21:25 Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2018-04-29  5:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-04-29  7:03   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-29  7:31     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2018-04-29 10:15   ` Rafał Miłecki
2018-04-30  0:09     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: LICENSES: Missing ISC text & possibly a category ("Not recommended" vs. "Preferred licenses")' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).