LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
@ 2015-03-10 15:32 Valentin Rothberg
  2015-03-11  1:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Rothberg @ 2015-03-10 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sylwester Nawrocki, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Kukjin Kim, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell,
	Kumar Gala, Chanwoo Choi, Inki Dae, linux-kernel,
	linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree,
	Andreas Ruprecht, hengelein Stefan, Paul Bolle

Hi Chanwoo,

your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
next-20150310).

This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433.  However, this option is not defined
in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
state:

+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o

Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol?  I
detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de).  There is also a tool in
the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).

Kind regards,
 Valentin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-03-10 15:32 ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig Valentin Rothberg
@ 2015-03-11  1:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
  2015-03-11  8:21   ` Valentin Rothberg
  2015-04-27  6:31   ` Valentin Rothberg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2015-03-11  1:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valentin Rothberg
  Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Kukjin Kim, Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell,
	Kumar Gala, Inki Dae, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc,
	linux-arm-kernel, devicetree, Andreas Ruprecht, hengelein Stefan,
	Paul Bolle, Arnd Bergmann,
	"김국진@kernel.org"

Hi Valentin,

I sent the Exynos5433 clock patch and then separately I'm sending the
Exynos5433 devicetree patch-set[1].
[1] [PATCH v6 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC
- https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036

But, according to Arnd bergmann's comment[2], latest Exynos5433 dt patch-set[1]
removed the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/85


So, I have plan to send following patch.

---
    clk: samsung: Use CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS instead of Exynos-specific configuration

    This patch removes the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{5433|7} and then use only the
    CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS for ARM-64bit Exynos SoC.

    Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
    Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
    Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
index 17e9af7..561719d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
@@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)        += clk-exynos5250.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)   += clk-exynos5260.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)   += clk-exynos5410.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)   += clk-exynos5420.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos5433.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)   += clk-exynos5440.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-audss.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-clkout.o


Regards,
Chanwoo Choi


On 03/11/2015 12:32 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
> common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
> next-20150310).
> 
> This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
> Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433.  However, this option is not defined
> in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
> state:
> 
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
> 
> Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol?  I
> detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
> Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de).  There is also a tool in
> the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).
> 
> Kind regards,
>  Valentin
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-03-11  1:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
@ 2015-03-11  8:21   ` Valentin Rothberg
  2015-04-27  6:31   ` Valentin Rothberg
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Rothberg @ 2015-03-11  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chanwoo Choi
  Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
	Inki Dae, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
	devicetree, Andreas Ruprecht, hengelein Stefan, Paul Bolle,
	Arnd Bergmann, 김국진@kernel.org

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I sent the Exynos5433 clock patch and then separately I'm sending the
> Exynos5433 devicetree patch-set[1].
> [1] [PATCH v6 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
>
> But, according to Arnd bergmann's comment[2], latest Exynos5433 dt patch-set[1]
> removed the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/85
>
>
> So, I have plan to send following patch.

Great!  Thanks for your reply and the explanation.

Kind regards,
 Valentin

> ---
>     clk: samsung: Use CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS instead of Exynos-specific configuration
>
>     This patch removes the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{5433|7} and then use only the
>     CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS for ARM-64bit Exynos SoC.
>
>     Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>     Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>     Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>     Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> index 17e9af7..561719d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)        += clk-exynos5250.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)   += clk-exynos5260.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)   += clk-exynos5410.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)   += clk-exynos5420.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos5433.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)   += clk-exynos5440.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-audss.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-clkout.o
>
>
> Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
>
>
> On 03/11/2015 12:32 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
>> common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>> next-20150310).
>>
>> This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
>> Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433.  However, this option is not defined
>> in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
>> state:
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
>>
>> Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol?  I
>> detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
>> Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de).  There is also a tool in
>> the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
>> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>  Valentin
>>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-03-11  1:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
  2015-03-11  8:21   ` Valentin Rothberg
@ 2015-04-27  6:31   ` Valentin Rothberg
  2015-04-28  9:25     ` Chanwoo Choi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Valentin Rothberg @ 2015-04-27  6:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chanwoo Choi
  Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Rob Herring, Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala,
	Inki Dae, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
	devicetree, Andreas Ruprecht, hengelein Stefan, Paul Bolle,
	Arnd Bergmann, 김국진@kernel.org

Hi Chanwoo,

this is a kind reminder that the issue mentioned below is still
present and made its way to v4.1-rc1.

Kind regards,
 Valentin

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
>
> I sent the Exynos5433 clock patch and then separately I'm sending the
> Exynos5433 devicetree patch-set[1].
> [1] [PATCH v6 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
>
> But, according to Arnd bergmann's comment[2], latest Exynos5433 dt patch-set[1]
> removed the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/85
>
>
> So, I have plan to send following patch.
>
> ---
>     clk: samsung: Use CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS instead of Exynos-specific configuration
>
>     This patch removes the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{5433|7} and then use only the
>     CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS for ARM-64bit Exynos SoC.
>
>     Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>     Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>     Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>     Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> index 17e9af7..561719d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)        += clk-exynos5250.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)   += clk-exynos5260.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)   += clk-exynos5410.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)   += clk-exynos5420.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos5433.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)   += clk-exynos5440.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-audss.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-clkout.o
>
>
> Regards,
> Chanwoo Choi
>
>
> On 03/11/2015 12:32 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>
>> your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
>> common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>> next-20150310).
>>
>> This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
>> Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433.  However, this option is not defined
>> in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
>> state:
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
>>
>> Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol?  I
>> detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
>> Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de).  There is also a tool in
>> the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
>> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>  Valentin
>>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-04-27  6:31   ` Valentin Rothberg
@ 2015-04-28  9:25     ` Chanwoo Choi
  2015-04-28  9:58       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2015-04-28  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Valentin Rothberg, Sylwester Nawrocki
  Cc: Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd, Rob Herring,
	Pawel Moll, Mark Rutland, Ian Campbell, Kumar Gala, Inki Dae,
	linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel, devicetree,
	Andreas Ruprecht, hengelein Stefan, Paul Bolle, Arnd Bergmann,
	김국진@kernel.org

Hi Valentin,


On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Valentin Rothberg
<valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chanwoo,
>
> this is a kind reminder that the issue mentioned below is still
> present and made its way to v4.1-rc1.

I sent the patch[1] to fix it. And Sylwester said that he will pick
this patchset on patch[2].
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/27/237
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/28/117

Hi Sylwester,
Could you apply a patch[1] on 4.2-rc2 to fix build warning?

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

>
> Kind regards,
>  Valentin
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Valentin,
>>
>> I sent the Exynos5433 clock patch and then separately I'm sending the
>> Exynos5433 devicetree patch-set[1].
>> [1] [PATCH v6 0/9] arm64: Add the support for new Exynos5433 SoC
>> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/9/1036
>>
>> But, according to Arnd bergmann's comment[2], latest Exynos5433 dt patch-set[1]
>> removed the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433.
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/24/85
>>
>>
>> So, I have plan to send following patch.
>>
>> ---
>>     clk: samsung: Use CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS instead of Exynos-specific configuration
>>
>>     This patch removes the CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS{5433|7} and then use only the
>>     CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS for ARM-64bit Exynos SoC.
>>
>>     Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
>>     Cc: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
>>     Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>     Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile | 4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
>> index 17e9af7..561719d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/Makefile
>> @@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5250)        += clk-exynos5250.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5260)   += clk-exynos5260.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5410)   += clk-exynos5410.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5420)   += clk-exynos5420.o
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos5433.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_EXYNOS5440)   += clk-exynos5440.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-audss.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS)      += clk-exynos-clkout.o
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chanwoo Choi
>>
>>
>> On 03/11/2015 12:32 AM, Valentin Rothberg wrote:
>>> Hi Chanwoo,
>>>
>>> your commit 96bd6224f07b ("clk: samsung: exynos5433: Add clocks using
>>> common clock framework") is included in today's linux-next tree (i.e.,
>>> next-20150310).
>>>
>>> This patch conditionally compiles clk-exynos5433.c depending on the
>>> Kconfig option ARCH_EXYNOS5433.  However, this option is not defined
>>> in Kconfig, so that the driver cannot be compiled at the current
>>> state:
>>>
>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5433)  += clk-exynos5433.o
>>>
>>> Is there a patch queued somewhere that adds this Kconfig symbol?  I
>>> detected the issue by running undertaker-checkpatch from the
>>> Undertaker tool suite (undertaker.cs.fau.de).  There is also a tool in
>>> the git tree that can detect such issues (i.e.,
>>> scripts/checkkconfigsymbols.py).
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>  Valentin
>>>
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-04-28  9:25     ` Chanwoo Choi
@ 2015-04-28  9:58       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
  2015-04-28 10:21         ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sylwester Nawrocki @ 2015-04-28  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: cw00.choi
  Cc: Valentin Rothberg, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Inki Dae, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
	devicetree, Paul Bolle

Hello,

On 28/04/15 11:25, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> Hi Valentin,
> 
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Valentin Rothberg
> <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Chanwoo,
>> >
>> > this is a kind reminder that the issue mentioned below is still
>> > present and made its way to v4.1-rc1.
>
> I sent the patch[1] to fix it. And Sylwester said that he will pick
> this patchset on patch[2].
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/27/237
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/28/117
> 
> Hi Sylwester,
> Could you apply a patch[1] on 4.2-rc2 to fix build warning?

Sure, I plan to send a pull request this week.

-- 
Regards,
Sylwester

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig
  2015-04-28  9:58       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
@ 2015-04-28 10:21         ` Chanwoo Choi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Chanwoo Choi @ 2015-04-28 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sylwester Nawrocki
  Cc: Valentin Rothberg, Tomasz Figa, Mike Turquette, Stephen Boyd,
	Inki Dae, linux-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-arm-kernel,
	devicetree, Paul Bolle

Hi Sylwester,

On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
<s.nawrocki@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 28/04/15 11:25, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> Hi Valentin,
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Valentin Rothberg
>> <valentinrothberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Chanwoo,
>>> >
>>> > this is a kind reminder that the issue mentioned below is still
>>> > present and made its way to v4.1-rc1.
>>
>> I sent the patch[1] to fix it. And Sylwester said that he will pick
>> this patchset on patch[2].
>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/27/237
>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/28/117
>>
>> Hi Sylwester,
>> Could you apply a patch[1] on 4.2-rc2 to fix build warning?
>
> Sure, I plan to send a pull request this week.

OK. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-28 10:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-10 15:32 ARCH_EXYNOS5433 missing in Kconfig Valentin Rothberg
2015-03-11  1:10 ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-03-11  8:21   ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-27  6:31   ` Valentin Rothberg
2015-04-28  9:25     ` Chanwoo Choi
2015-04-28  9:58       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2015-04-28 10:21         ` Chanwoo Choi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).