LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Anderson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Jaehoon Chung <email@example.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Alim Akhtar <email@example.com>,
Sonny Rao <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <email@example.com>,
Alexandru Stan <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <email@example.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
Chris Ball <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Shawn Lin <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Consider HLE errors to be data and command errors
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:13:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XFUKXRRRyVLOTV1ORtYfG1ngEqic-CYLp9S=C=8eJYkw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:08 PM, Jaehoon Chung <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On 05/18/2016 09:47 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Doug Anderson <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Jaehoon Chung <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> Dear Doug,
>>>> I'm considering to control HLE error..So holding this patch.
>>>> If this is absolutely necessary patch, let me know, plz.
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Jaehoon Chung
>>> Sounds OK. I have certainly applied this locally and the driver isn't
>>> robust against insertions / removals without it, but once the card is
>>> inserted things are OK so it's probably not urgent that it be applied
>>> upstream. Hopefully we can figure out a better solution...
>> I'm now testing a nice new rebased kernel and I'm hitting this again.
>> Of course I'll just pick my same patch to my new kernel tree, but
>> since it's been a year and nobody has done anything better, would you
>> consider landing my patch? It is certainly better than nothing.
> Sure, it's right.
> I think that main reason of HLE is wait_prvdata_complete. (I'm guessing..)
> On other hands, dwmmc controller is handling something wrong. (I found that HLE is occurred the similar case.)
> After find the main solution, it's not bad that your patch is applied on dwmmc controller.
> Ulf have sent PR for next..So if we needs to apply this, i will apply on fix.
It's not new, so I'd say just queue it up for the next version
whenever it's convenient.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-18 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 15:48 Doug Anderson
2015-03-13 11:30 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-03-13 20:27 ` Doug Anderson
2015-03-16 5:56 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-03-30 0:55 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-03-30 15:47 ` Doug Anderson
2016-05-18 0:47 ` Doug Anderson
2016-05-18 1:59 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-18 4:12 ` Doug Anderson
2016-05-18 9:14 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-18 17:37 ` Doug Anderson
2016-05-18 18:01 ` Heiko Stuebner
2016-05-19 11:31 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-19 13:07 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-05-26 2:23 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-26 3:59 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-05-26 4:07 ` Shawn Lin
2016-05-18 2:08 ` Jaehoon Chung
2016-05-18 4:13 ` Doug Anderson [this message]
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] mmc: dw_mmc: Consider HLE errors to be data and command errors' \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).