LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
To: Michel Machado <michel@digirati.com.br>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux XIA - merge proposal
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:01:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo6hUHYXrdB0+1WysD=AMuX3eawqSokTngR4s2tmmuakqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54F5EF6E.9090303@digirati.com.br>

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Michel Machado <michel@digirati.com.br> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>    We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that emphasizes
> evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years, and it has now
> reached a degree of maturity that allows others to experiment with it.  In
> addition to the kernel implementation, we have a userland tool to set up the
> stack, a Wireshark fork with extensions for XIA packets, an implemented
> solution to interoperate with IPv4 networks, forwarding performance
> evaluation of our code, support for Linux containers, and an exemplifying
> demo; all documented on our wiki [1]. Outlining the full benefits of XIA
> goes beyond the scope of this e-mail, but we present an in-depth discussion
> on our wiki and in our peer-reviewed academic publications referenced there.
>
>    Linux XIA is not yet mature enough for production, but we do think that
> broader exposure will help us to move forward faster, and get more in tune
> with the interested community. Thus, we are writing to ask to merge our work
> into the Linux kernel.
>
>    We are aware of all of the effort required to review a large chunk of
> code, so to lower this burden, we propose to merge our new network stack via
> staging. This would give time for the community at large to get acquainted
> with XIA's concepts, and review the code. Of course, we will address
> feedback as it comes in. We're aware that the current Linux staging process
> [2] is geared toward drivers and filesystems, but not network stacks. We're
> fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging as well as
> helping to define this review process for network stacks.
>
>    Linux XIA is highly confined in its folder net/xia. There are a few
> headers in folder include/net, but all the names of these headers are of the
> form xia_*.h. Patches outside these files are minimal. This high isolation
> is a guarantee that Linux XIA can be dropped out of the kernel with little
> work if needed.
>
>    Finally, there are several other research groups around the world working
> on other future Internet architectures.  We hope that the process of merging
> Linux XIA will provide a template for these other groups to merge their
> network stacks into Linux in the future.

>From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
reasonable starting point for a discussion, and I'm disappointed that
it got shut down so fast.  It might not be in *exactly* the form
people are looking for, but hey, it's an introductory email, and
Michel seems open to constructive feedback.

Bjorn

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-10 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-03 17:29 Michel Machado
2015-03-03 23:33 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-03-04  0:14   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-04  0:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-03-04  0:31   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-04  5:49     ` Greg KH
2015-03-04 13:01       ` Michel Machado
2015-03-05 16:31 ` Alex Elsayed
2015-03-05 18:34 ` Michel Machado
2015-03-10 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2015-03-10 17:19   ` Eric Dumazet
2015-03-10 22:01     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-03-13 15:26   ` Michel Machado
2015-03-15  9:37     ` Greg KH
2015-03-15 10:03       ` Oded Gabbay
2015-03-17 12:37         ` Michel Machado
2015-03-17 12:25       ` Michel Machado
2015-03-18 10:27         ` Oded Gabbay
2015-03-20 18:46           ` Michel Machado
2015-03-20 19:41             ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAErSpo6hUHYXrdB0+1WysD=AMuX3eawqSokTngR4s2tmmuakqA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michel@digirati.com.br \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: Linux XIA - merge proposal' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).