From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F9FC432BE for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A01961019 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 17:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236983AbhHLRlQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:41:16 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36618 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236425AbhHLRlP (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:41:15 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 675D7C061756; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id q10so9442318wro.2; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:40:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xtdQLvjPjv0VFnymA3MJ/ZBQrWAvyh02E35C2a4b0fw=; b=afrSxcQrgrx5gLO+SX6yckc/hp8/a4L8elF95WR6y2VEUp1eJ0DB02wBANyzJHgwK9 udmrpXjwtBAYCBeitvcDDgiG/AsQxRoPXYTK+aOS99v+WcAiTU+H09RUcP9DVJMpPJ1p XuWPAIGAGldNquoKhvo1xx+XLu7bkZLHNp1e030UYBxdinvoN3STF0NKHAdoSGaAUoi6 QojGbZTX4WUSGqFQ4d2jQh+cUnu3JWFp/d0EtDO6dzRA3tsFf4w7oPuseILSMrVFZ9sN rZsk4kI2TR448qr/xB9E2r1Kgki0MKObTvff4UatSETNAE+/LJI484OojK3TOGmgsbBd A9iQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xtdQLvjPjv0VFnymA3MJ/ZBQrWAvyh02E35C2a4b0fw=; b=aYvHwRtwnUJFtcijl0ltq0pwV58yghmCwRd9ehKlUjxSSZI/nGfAewMdQp6zbAMmoI oDz9pRe3JPyicpkQsA31EuHIv6HLQhRPbQj+lbXpy0otOEvDIH8wUsMnOygJuIq+rQDh Hj567STgINsSDDK4DzLNGMOjy3JM4aZdraYroUVdlxiRZa/Q2o4ZacR5TJ9sdZhZqJUX wFXI2J4cY/EYGK4dN31MVapYFiZVvAWV/leju3klR3GIUiQa/cemqAQpagJOPetnFFis b0pUyHRTI5YjjlPUIR2Ktzv2kmdGxWZAnrCkrAEhLESmmVmuARf10FpvHn2pHQtKq4Wy C2tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532t3mLOhq62R6t7KBk+crhN33CZObcBO8i21d7pqn200Sr4gVWa SxW2qBpZ0G3jRHzt7bPFIi8zbaTd2JAcMptuVXQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlE105yhAhGgsHNT7Nc7Yi8zQggP8RT7fprusgr3rX2hm2op41s5yRrlr1/xo3E0R4pxqbOFzarTDjAkfLxpk= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e3c7:: with SMTP id k7mr5137656wrm.327.1628790048003; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:40:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210811235253.924867-1-robdclark@gmail.com> <20210811235253.924867-3-robdclark@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rob Clark Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:45:03 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/msm/dsi: Support NO_CONNECTOR bridges To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: dri-devel , linux-arm-msm , freedreno , Laurent Pinchart , Stephen Boyd , Douglas Anderson , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Dmitry Baryshkov , Abhinav Kumar , Bjorn Andersson , open list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 10:31 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:52:48PM -0700, Rob Clark wrote: > > From: Rob Clark > > > > For now, since we have a mix of bridges which support this flag, which > > which do *not* support this flag, or work both ways, try it once with > > NO_CONNECTOR and then fall back to the old way if that doesn't work. > > Eventually we can drop the fallback path. > > Which bridges are missing support for the NO_CONNECTOR flags that you > are using? Currently (as far as things that I am aware of) it is just ti-sn65dsi86, which the last two patches in this series convert. But who knows what someone somewhere decides to build ;-) BR, -R > Background for the question is that if you are using one of the bridges > missing a conversion then we could do the conversion and maybe you could > help with some tests. > > We in the above sentence is likely me, so it may take some weeks, > but known there is a chance for testing is a good motivator. > > Sam