LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sun Paul <paulrbk@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@fh-muenster.de>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Question on SCTP ABORT chunk is generated when the association_max_retrans is reached
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:27:10 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFXGft+XZCmhuwj2QTCiU0MD10Uo+WZ3WCC+rfbsd_Lxbhk3iw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54C29B82.7090502@redhat.com>

Hi

sorry for the late reply. I am a bit confused. when side-A sends a
request to side-B, and side-B return the response, but side-A keep
re-transmit the same request to side-B, why side-B needed to send a
ABORT to side-A?

If it is used in order to reestablish the connection, shoudn't it
should be side-A to send ABORT instead?

- PS

On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 3:05 AM, Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 01/23/2015 07:36 PM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Yepp. It might not reach the peer or it might. If it does it helps
>> to keep the states in sync. If it doesn't it sometimes helps in
>> analysing tracefiles. In BSD, we also send it. It is not required,
>> doesn't harm and is useful in some cases...
>
>
> Ok, as the TCB is destroyed in any case, should be fine then.
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-26  1:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFXGftKp3=OfjkCVBuR-zM3+uZ42Sk_9i2UjAHBNnbX=hQJwpA@mail.gmail.com>
2015-01-23 10:25 ` Fwd: " Sun Paul
2015-01-23 11:50   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-23 16:05     ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-01-23 17:10       ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-23 18:30         ` Vlad Yasevich
2015-01-23 18:36           ` Michael Tuexen
2015-01-26 13:47           ` Fwd: " Neil Horman
2015-01-23 18:36         ` Michael Tuexen
2015-01-23 19:05           ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-26  1:27             ` Sun Paul [this message]
2015-01-26 11:46               ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-01-26 13:17                 ` Sun Paul
2015-01-26 13:30                   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-01-23 16:08   ` Fwd: " Vlad Yasevich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFXGft+XZCmhuwj2QTCiU0MD10Uo+WZ3WCC+rfbsd_Lxbhk3iw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paulrbk@gmail.com \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tuexen@fh-muenster.de \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    --subject='Re: Question on SCTP ABORT chunk is generated when the association_max_retrans is reached' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).