LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com, Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/6] pstore: further reduce ramoops_get_next_prz arguments by passing record
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 20:32:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJi5M+wfF8X7ud2jTjdJZRE4sCnZgv9OA9ZX-wwpZ5PnA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181026180042.52199-4-joel@joelfernandes.org>

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 7:00 PM, Joel Fernandes (Google)
<joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> Both the id and type fields of a pstore_record are set by
> ramoops_get_next_prz. So we can just pass a pointer to the pstore_record
> instead of passing individual elements. This results in cleaner more
> readable code and fewer lines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 3055e05acab1..710c3d30bac0 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int ramoops_pstore_open(struct pstore_info *psi)
>
>  static struct persistent_ram_zone *
>  ramoops_get_next_prz(struct persistent_ram_zone *przs[], uint *c,
> -                    u64 *id, enum pstore_type_id *typep, bool update)
> +                    struct pstore_record *record, bool update)
>  {
>         struct persistent_ram_zone *prz;
>         int i = (*c)++;
> @@ -145,8 +145,8 @@ ramoops_get_next_prz(struct persistent_ram_zone *przs[], uint *c,
>         if (!persistent_ram_old_size(prz))
>                 return NULL;
>
> -       *typep = prz->type;
> -       *id = i;
> +       record->type = prz->type;
> +       record->id = i;

Yes yes. I've been meaning to get all this cleaned up after I
refactored everything to actually HAVE record at all. :P

>
>         return prz;
>  }
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
>         /* Find the next valid persistent_ram_zone for DMESG */
>         while (cxt->dump_read_cnt < cxt->max_dump_cnt && !prz) {
>                 prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(cxt->dprzs, &cxt->dump_read_cnt,
> -                                          &record->id, &record->type, 1);
> +                                          record, 1);

In another patch, I think you could drop the "update" field too, and
use the record->type instead to determine if update is needed. Like:

static struct persistent_ram_zone *
ramoops_get_next_prz(struct persistent_ram_zone *przs[], uint c,
                                      struct pstore_record *record)
{
    bool update = (record->type == PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG);
...

>                 if (!prz_ok(prz))
>                         continue;
>                 header_length = ramoops_read_kmsg_hdr(persistent_ram_old(prz),
> @@ -270,18 +270,17 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
>
>         if (!prz_ok(prz))
>                 prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(&cxt->cprz, &cxt->console_read_cnt,
> -                                          &record->id, &record->type, 0);
> +                                          record, 0);
>
>         if (!prz_ok(prz))
>                 prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(&cxt->mprz, &cxt->pmsg_read_cnt,
> -                                          &record->id, &record->type, 0);
> +                                          record, 0);
>
>         /* ftrace is last since it may want to dynamically allocate memory. */
>         if (!prz_ok(prz)) {
>                 if (!(cxt->flags & RAMOOPS_FLAG_FTRACE_PER_CPU)) {
>                         prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(cxt->fprzs,
> -                                       &cxt->ftrace_read_cnt, &record->id,
> -                                       &record->type, 0);
> +                                       &cxt->ftrace_read_cnt, record, 0);
>                 } else {
>                         /*
>                          * Build a new dummy record which combines all the
> @@ -298,8 +297,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(struct pstore_record *record)
>                         while (cxt->ftrace_read_cnt < cxt->max_ftrace_cnt) {
>                                 prz_next = ramoops_get_next_prz(cxt->fprzs,
>                                                 &cxt->ftrace_read_cnt,
> -                                               &record->id,
> -                                               &record->type, 0);
> +                                               record, 0);
>
>                                 if (!prz_ok(prz_next))
>                                         continue;
> --
> 2.19.1.568.g152ad8e336-goog
>



-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-26 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-26 18:00 [RFC 1/6] pstore: map pstore types to names Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 18:00 ` [RFC 2/6] pstore: remove type argument from ramoops_get_next_prz Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 19:05   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 18:00 ` [RFC 3/6] pstore: remove max " Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 19:22   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 19:27     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 19:40       ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 19:22   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 18:00 ` [RFC 4/6] pstore: further reduce ramoops_get_next_prz arguments by passing record Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 19:32   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2018-10-26 19:36     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 18:00 ` [RFC 5/6] pstore: donot treat empty buffers as valid Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 19:39   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 20:22     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 18:00 ` [RFC 6/6] Revert "pstore/ram_core: Do not reset restored zone's position and size" Joel Fernandes (Google)
2018-10-26 18:16   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 18:22     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 19:42       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-26 20:09         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 19:04 ` [RFC 1/6] pstore: map pstore types to names Kees Cook
2018-10-26 20:35   ` Joel Fernandes
2018-10-26 20:41     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGXu5jJi5M+wfF8X7ud2jTjdJZRE4sCnZgv9OA9ZX-wwpZ5PnA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=anton@enomsg.org \
    --cc=ccross@android.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [RFC 4/6] pstore: further reduce ramoops_get_next_prz arguments by passing record' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).