From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D180CC4338F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37E961212 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 05:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238030AbhHYGAZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:00:25 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:55470 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232442AbhHYGAU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 02:00:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1629871174; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hZq8ux83RWRAGT7dU7S94nIBykQroT633MHGxDAPovQ=; b=a91Zf2iAt/CNyQpw44Nx1QIWEk5odZ5GYQ1s8jK5JMmka94/yqBsfRvuIZ9yW7HmgWp+Xa rhBt4bvyjLBxRVK4cC2vrUTGocWCksRpeQqhq4zWj8g87U/YojRHNtyDA5cYOsKxu/4ttU CfUFo7EOEWNrRRYSeMg555TuWs/e2Gc= Received: from mail-yb1-f197.google.com (mail-yb1-f197.google.com [209.85.219.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-547-flwWYNxcPIqeqd6Y9fJcqw-1; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 01:59:32 -0400 X-MC-Unique: flwWYNxcPIqeqd6Y9fJcqw-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f197.google.com with SMTP id e137-20020a25698f000000b0059b84c50006so3977599ybc.11 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hZq8ux83RWRAGT7dU7S94nIBykQroT633MHGxDAPovQ=; b=rdamfgYKLUTBr/jKDdJ7gbMxh9vHUvx9kNlzVrpwODO5IlXbj5+GodsHzopg2Yz2zp LOmNZKGX4xcZH+bchmO3yJ4v7aIFweZ9kNGJWDPVmfsyvFZgX0mXWn/x4R7PeF3icQcl UvNdYQKGqvgcj6PbQt5FlJJA41q+5J6PtAXQw0B0Opfm+NjSugSKzo9Aqk0mo424h5u9 LSN/fFS+rrafT7BByEto0JeQr9x+j5ieHatI5pFl18EeySlqotR7G5kpc31YtVH2J1zC ShdWxV5kouiFdFKpY2/a+pI0u31rzqat3C4goEsps8aB1BJQuptYgFzRu3/DKu1JkXBl MOxg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331dHR6gCSYKA/X9YJOwSWB1cN1u4vula+73O5AIJUK8rX4t7DQ Odueuxg507fCzNEGxrcYjIf/ICLYFaagMPz467bH1bhk1jvY8CF9gpGnMHeZ/91UPCxOnh5aR1e rpdCVC9pPooPzhMHiq12DS+2PHEcxlXWdPqa3r3+c X-Received: by 2002:a25:cb11:: with SMTP id b17mr17075074ybg.438.1629871172167; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:59:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwU6u2ecWhLicWmFg6FwEcsOJ/sHApqkz1nmY/9nb65gcMxPrdb8Dmgi6eXH0NLTjyMcu4XKdYt5m2iVC1FVJ0= X-Received: by 2002:a25:cb11:: with SMTP id b17mr17075057ybg.438.1629871171995; Tue, 24 Aug 2021 22:59:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <00000000000072e53a05c983ab22@google.com> <20210816091041.3313-1-hdanton@sina.com> <20210816093336.GA3950@lst.de> <20210819090510.GA12194@lst.de> <20210819135308.GB3395@lst.de> <20210824072340.GA25108@lst.de> In-Reply-To: <20210824072340.GA25108@lst.de> From: Yi Zhang Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:59:19 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [syzbot] general protection fault in wb_timer_fn To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Sven Schnelle , Hillf Danton , syzbot , Jens Axboe , linux-block , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 3:23 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 03:48:01PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote: > > I also met similar issue with blktests, I tried to apply the patchset > > but with no luck to apply them, any suggestions to fix it. > > Please just retests the latest for-5.15/block or for-next branch in > Jens' tree. > Yeah, the issue was fixed with for-5.15/block -- Best Regards, Yi Zhang