LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc. [not found] <CAHkaATRAuo=Mh1tmMVDxnWeO8ARjW+KBfHNLpaFG3XxN5uY-hQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2014-09-27 15:13 ` Catalin Marinas 2014-09-28 0:44 ` Miles MH Chen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2014-09-27 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miles MH Chen; +Cc: Will Deacon, linux-kernel On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:09, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> > --- > arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > index 4164c5a..273cf6d 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_noncoherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, > ptr = __dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs); > if (!ptr) > goto no_mem; > - map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, flags & ~GFP_DMA); > + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, > + flags & ~(GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32)); Do you have an explanation on why this is needed (and such explanation should also be included in the commit log)? We don’t use ZONE_DMA32 on arm64 (we did initially but it was for the wrong reasons). Thanks, Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc. 2014-09-27 15:13 ` [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc Catalin Marinas @ 2014-09-28 0:44 ` Miles MH Chen 2014-12-08 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Miles MH Chen @ 2014-09-28 0:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Catalin Marinas; +Cc: Will Deacon, linux-kernel On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:09, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> >> --- >> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >> index 4164c5a..273cf6d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c >> @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_noncoherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, >> ptr = __dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs); >> if (!ptr) >> goto no_mem; >> - map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, flags & ~GFP_DMA); >> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, >> + flags & ~(GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32)); > > Do you have an explanation on why this is needed (and such explanation > should also be included in the commit log)? We don’t use ZONE_DMA32 on > arm64 (we did initially but it was for the wrong reasons). If GFP_DMA32 is passed to dma_alloc_coherent, the flag will go to kmalloc and trigger a BUG_ON check in slab allocator: __dma_alloc_noncoherent kmalloc new_slab BUG_ON(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK); It can be avoided this by removing GFP_DMA32 before passing it to kmalloc or we should block GFP_DMA32 flag earlier in arch/arm64/dma-mapping.c if GFP_DMA32 is not allowed in arch/arm64/dma-mapping.c. Thanks, MH > > Thanks, > > Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc. 2014-09-28 0:44 ` Miles MH Chen @ 2014-12-08 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Catalin Marinas @ 2014-12-08 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Miles MH Chen; +Cc: Will Deacon, linux-kernel On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 01:44:15AM +0100, Miles MH Chen wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Catalin Marinas > <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote: > > On 27 Sep 2014, at 16:09, Miles MH Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Min-Hua Chen <orca.chen@gmail.com> > >> --- > >> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 3 ++- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > >> index 4164c5a..273cf6d 100644 > >> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c > >> @@ -103,7 +103,8 @@ static void *__dma_alloc_noncoherent(struct device *dev, size_t size, > >> ptr = __dma_alloc_coherent(dev, size, dma_handle, flags, attrs); > >> if (!ptr) > >> goto no_mem; > >> - map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, flags & ~GFP_DMA); > >> + map = kmalloc(sizeof(struct page *) << order, > >> + flags & ~(GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32)); > > > > Do you have an explanation on why this is needed (and such explanation > > should also be included in the commit log)? We don’t use ZONE_DMA32 on > > arm64 (we did initially but it was for the wrong reasons). > > If GFP_DMA32 is passed to dma_alloc_coherent, the flag will go to kmalloc and > trigger a BUG_ON check in slab allocator: > > __dma_alloc_noncoherent > kmalloc > new_slab BUG_ON(flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK); > > It can be avoided this by removing GFP_DMA32 before passing it to kmalloc > or we should block GFP_DMA32 flag earlier in arch/arm64/dma-mapping.c if > GFP_DMA32 is not allowed in arch/arm64/dma-mapping.c. With commit d4932f9e81ae (arm64: add atomic pool for non-coherent and CMA allocations), this fix is no longer needed. Prior to this we could simply use GFP_KERNEL rather than masking out bits as we don't care about atomic contexts prior to the commit I mentioned. -- Catalin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-12-08 17:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <CAHkaATRAuo=Mh1tmMVDxnWeO8ARjW+KBfHNLpaFG3XxN5uY-hQ@mail.gmail.com> 2014-09-27 15:13 ` [PATCH] Remove GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 from flags before passing it into kmalloc Catalin Marinas 2014-09-28 0:44 ` Miles MH Chen 2014-12-08 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).