LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/APCI: Move acpi_pci_osc_support() check to negotiation phase
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2021 14:04:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0if-5A0vZSTeDvqLtqE2jZrKjCFcRouR2uFgycZ7CdWkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210714085512.2176-2-joro@8bytes.org>

On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 10:55 AM Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
>
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
>
> The acpi_pci_osc_support() does an _OSC query with _OSC supported set
> to what the OS supports but a zero _OSC control value, only to later
> claim the features Linux wants to control with an extra _OSC query.
>
> Nothing between the two _OSC querys depends on the result of the first
> one (if successfull), and if the supported query fails the control
> query will fail too. So it is a good code simplification to combine
> these two querys into one.
>
> As a result the acpi_pci_osc_support() function can be removed and
> acpi_pci_query_osc() be simplified because it no longer called with a
> NULL pointer for *control. Also some code duplication in the existing
> error paths was consolidated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index d7deedf3548e..c703832b7f7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -201,31 +201,20 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_query_osc(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>
>         support &= OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS;
>         support |= root->osc_support_set;
> +       *control &= OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
>
>         capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = OSC_QUERY_ENABLE;
>         capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = support;
> -       if (control) {
> -               *control &= OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS;
> -               capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
> -       } else {
> -               /* Run _OSC query only with existing controls. */
> -               capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = root->osc_control_set;
> -       }
> +       capbuf[OSC_CONTROL_DWORD] = *control | root->osc_control_set;
>
>         status = acpi_pci_run_osc(root->device->handle, capbuf, &result);
>         if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>                 root->osc_support_set = support;
> -               if (control)
> -                       *control = result;
> +               *control = result;
>         }
>         return status;
>  }
>
> -static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_support(struct acpi_pci_root *root, u32 flags)
> -{
> -       return acpi_pci_query_osc(root, flags, NULL);
> -}
> -
>  struct acpi_pci_root *acpi_pci_find_root(acpi_handle handle)
>  {
>         struct acpi_pci_root *root;
> @@ -348,7 +337,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_dev);
>   * _OSC bits the BIOS has granted control of, but its contents are meaningless
>   * on failure.
>   **/
> -static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 req)
> +static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32
> +                                           *mask, u32 req, u32 support)
>  {
>         struct acpi_pci_root *root;
>         acpi_status status;
> @@ -372,7 +362,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
>
>         /* Need to check the available controls bits before requesting them. */
>         while (*mask) {
> -               status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, root->osc_support_set, mask);
> +               status = acpi_pci_query_osc(root, support, mask);
>                 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>                         return status;
>                 if (ctrl == *mask)
> @@ -402,7 +392,7 @@ static acpi_status acpi_pci_osc_control_set(acpi_handle handle, u32 *mask, u32 r
>  static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
>                                  bool is_pcie)
>  {
> -       u32 support, control, requested;
> +       u32 support, control = 0, requested;
>         acpi_status status;
>         struct acpi_device *device = root->device;
>         acpi_handle handle = device->handle;
> @@ -435,59 +425,49 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
>                 support |= OSC_PCI_EDR_SUPPORT;
>
>         decode_osc_support(root, "OS supports", support);
> -       status = acpi_pci_osc_support(root, support);
> -       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> -               *no_aspm = 1;
>
> -               /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
> -               if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
> +       if (!pcie_ports_disabled) {

If pcie_ports_disabled is set, we don't want to request any control
from the platform firmware at all and, specifically, we don't want to
evaluate _OSC with the OSC_QUERY_ENABLE clear in
capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD].

I'm not sure how this is achieved after your changes.

> +               if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
> +                       decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
> +                                       ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
>                         return;
> +               }
>
> -               dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> -                        acpi_format_exception(status));
> -               return;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (pcie_ports_disabled) {
> -               dev_info(&device->dev, "PCIe port services disabled; not requesting _OSC control\n");
> -               return;
> -       }
> -
> -       if ((support & ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) != ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT) {
> -               decode_osc_support(root, "not requesting OS control; OS requires",
> -                                  ACPI_PCIE_REQ_SUPPORT);
> -               return;
> -       }
> -
> -       control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
> -               | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
> +               control = OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL
> +                       | OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
> -               control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIEASPM))
> +                       control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> -               control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_PCIE))
> +                       control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
>
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
> -               control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
> +                       control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
>
> -       if (pci_aer_available())
> -               control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> +               if (pci_aer_available())
> +                       control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> -        * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
> -        * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
> -        * and EDR.
> -        */
> -       if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> -               control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> +               /*
> +                * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> +                * the PCI Firmware Spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, table 4-5,
> +                * OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL indicates the OS supports both DPC
> +                * and EDR.
> +                */
> +               if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DPC) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_EDR))
> +                       control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL;
> +       }
>
> +       /* Need an _OSC call even with pcie_ports_disabled set */
>         requested = control;
>         status = acpi_pci_osc_control_set(handle, &control,
> -                                         OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL);
> +                                         OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_CAPABILITY_CONTROL,
> +                                         support);
> +
>         if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> -               decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
> +               if (control)
> +                       decode_osc_control(root, "OS now controls", control);
> +
>                 if (acpi_gbl_FADT.boot_flags & ACPI_FADT_NO_ASPM) {
>                         /*
>                          * We have ASPM control, but the FADT indicates that
> @@ -498,10 +478,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
>                         *no_aspm = 1;
>                 }
>         } else {
> -               decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
> -               decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
> -               dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> -                       acpi_format_exception(status));
> +               /* Platform wants to control PCIe features */
> +               root->osc_support_set = 0;
>
>                 /*
>                  * We want to disable ASPM here, but aspm_disabled
> @@ -511,6 +489,18 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
>                  * root scan.
>                  */
>                 *no_aspm = 1;
> +
> +               /* _OSC is optional for PCI host bridges */
> +               if ((status == AE_NOT_FOUND) && !is_pcie)
> +                       return;
> +
> +               if (requested) {
> +                       decode_osc_control(root, "OS requested", requested);
> +                       decode_osc_control(root, "platform willing to grant", control);
> +               }
> +
> +               dev_info(&device->dev, "_OSC: platform retains control of PCIe features (%s)\n",
> +                       acpi_format_exception(status));
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-14 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-14  8:55 [PATCH v2 0/2] PCI/ACPI: Simplify PCIe _OSC feature negotiation Joerg Roedel
2021-07-14  8:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/APCI: Move acpi_pci_osc_support() check to negotiation phase Joerg Roedel
2021-07-14 12:04   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-07-15  7:34     ` Joerg Roedel
2021-07-14  8:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI/ACPI: Remove OSC_PCI_SUPPORT_MASKS and OSC_PCI_CONTROL_MASKS Joerg Roedel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0if-5A0vZSTeDvqLtqE2jZrKjCFcRouR2uFgycZ7CdWkg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI/APCI: Move acpi_pci_osc_support() check to negotiation phase' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).