From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,FROM_EXCESS_BASE64, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308FCC282DD for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 16:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0653221473 for ; Wed, 22 May 2019 16:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="TsIh23HR" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730011AbfEVQPj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 12:15:39 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-f196.google.com ([209.85.219.196]:43527 "EHLO mail-yb1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729576AbfEVQPj (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 May 2019 12:15:39 -0400 Received: by mail-yb1-f196.google.com with SMTP id n145so1065079ybg.10; Wed, 22 May 2019 09:15:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H2QOYmtrbMv2RwSsZzKZlIgE2lZOebGHxtRTWGwCUK8=; b=TsIh23HRLdI8hEqPtQ30fFSZzK3/A1tyuR7wi8bJAddsbCkyN0GMgWgPVR3rgKILCq FrjrSON1dGlThNxb6/6otMCvetSODgQPtK+wCIUhqMULhi+c8WlRIZmlkJ0P+HcMxQ8u 7yPysCT0YucMkd14fGXTR2A7RsGbxmWl/6v+RXwx++xvoi7fJRqw6R9i/QHjVz9JM1Jo Q1Qlo/bOw4egn1BpoPLWvnMrKgLZ9NEiLUWJNYq/Hj2xcoWn3Q2P8krIEgqDVbCR0vtm ArAa3hmhxNyAeVNo3DWT2VcBqjFu3i1zmzbnIZkNrRlh0EMNdQuROjTN9nfPKbOQ4oNO DeeQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H2QOYmtrbMv2RwSsZzKZlIgE2lZOebGHxtRTWGwCUK8=; b=Qi3y8e5hcaBOpW/ZPT5d35OlBGA8YAhnnRZiBDYrTV4Li3wmH35jBiXAIo+Y7tBW8X 1kiZ8zKzdVyEpdKNfqDm12e6eEMD1ocSDNHeK04M9pncR7b/ugY0zQjsoixqDvyPbnmw HiSseIlfn//zb77d3YQ7v+T3qxv8y9YXIIV00MmQHwbCDeHfXMNu24yQ4JY4EROdDHIm 6J+I3jGvdfbnEa6xC0x1l6x7h+nn6Q7EnCdTMYHUfPxGIa2buClkUac4tblNpnnKOuxP d600gnv3lsXl8Movzr15k7nOnx3pMbJCcnPXKT3z5pVTB9Wn57cklE++TNdlN+rgpULN 6Tnw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVzfr7qsZ5uHBbuTD+pLy5xSTTU/G0OJa3z1WZBIC+PkuMMRAZH INUal63bVuVPd8O7AZeZ/BK6BojjQ/idJevMLtU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyPQIgHEnxdgVx+UouRSudO6JPKLPIolrSmSVfkcCwrLtqxxyhpQn1v2Hu8mH5g9waksx4+zTXkVOk8H8NtNxI= X-Received: by 2002:a25:ae22:: with SMTP id a34mr6825427ybj.438.1558541737775; Wed, 22 May 2019 09:15:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190521160330.28402-1-peron.clem@gmail.com> <20190521160330.28402-4-peron.clem@gmail.com> <20190522103243.mmrfato5p2mhtf4j@flea> In-Reply-To: <20190522103243.mmrfato5p2mhtf4j@flea> From: =?UTF-8?B?Q2zDqW1lbnQgUMOpcm9u?= Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 18:15:26 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: watchdog: add Allwinner H6 r_watchdog To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Guenter Roeck , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, devicetree , linux-arm-kernel , linux-kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Maxime, On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 12:32, Maxime Ripard wro= te: > > On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 06:03:28PM +0200, Cl=C3=A9ment P=C3=A9ron wrote: > > Allwinner H6 has a second watchdog on the r-blocks which is > > compatible with the A31. > > > > This commit add the H6 compatible for the r_watchdog. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cl=C3=A9ment P=C3=A9ron > > Unless you have some evidence that the two blocks are different, then > you should just reuse the same one. I have no evidence it's different nor identical, it's not documented in the user manual. I thought it would better to have separate bindings in case there is a difference. Than don't have and find later that we have to introduce one. But as you prefer. Regards, Cl=C3=A9ment > > Maxime > > -- > Maxime Ripard, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com