LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rob Clark" <robdclark@gmail.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Sai Prakash Ranjan" <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>,
	"Jonathan Marek" <jonathan@marek.ca>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Sharat Masetty" <smasetty@codeaurora.org>,
	"Akhil P Oommen" <akhilpo@codeaurora.org>,
	"Jordan Crouse" <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM ADRENO GPU"
	<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, "Sean Paul" <sean@poorly.run>,
	"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/msm: Utilize gpu scheduler priorities
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:53:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJs_Fx6Nc337LPNh=p2GT2d2yDTdLWH934o4Cof3urDGhUJB6A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84e03c5f-a3af-6592-d19a-a2f5d20b92fb@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 7:45 AM Tvrtko Ursulin
<tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 28/07/2021 02:06, Rob Clark wrote:
> > From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> >
> > The drm/scheduler provides additional prioritization on top of that
> > provided by however many number of ringbuffers (each with their own
> > priority level) is supported on a given generation.  Expose the
> > additional levels of priority to userspace and map the userspace
> > priority back to ring (first level of priority) and schedular priority
> > (additional priority levels within the ring).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
> > Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c |  4 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c    |  4 +-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h           | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c   | 35 +++++++--------
> >   include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h              | 14 +++++-
> >   5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > index bad4809b68ef..748665232d29 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.c
> > @@ -261,8 +261,8 @@ int adreno_get_param(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint32_t param, uint64_t *value)
> >                       return ret;
> >               }
> >               return -EINVAL;
> > -     case MSM_PARAM_NR_RINGS:
> > -             *value = gpu->nr_rings;
> > +     case MSM_PARAM_PRIORITIES:
> > +             *value = gpu->nr_rings * NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES;
> >               return 0;
> >       case MSM_PARAM_PP_PGTABLE:
> >               *value = 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > index 450efe59abb5..c2ecec5b11c4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_submit.c
> > @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ static struct msm_gem_submit *submit_create(struct drm_device *dev,
> >       submit->gpu = gpu;
> >       submit->cmd = (void *)&submit->bos[nr_bos];
> >       submit->queue = queue;
> > -     submit->ring = gpu->rb[queue->prio];
> > +     submit->ring = gpu->rb[queue->ring_nr];
> >       submit->fault_dumped = false;
> >
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&submit->node);
> > @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> >       /* Get a unique identifier for the submission for logging purposes */
> >       submitid = atomic_inc_return(&ident) - 1;
> >
> > -     ring = gpu->rb[queue->prio];
> > +     ring = gpu->rb[queue->ring_nr];
> >       trace_msm_gpu_submit(pid_nr(pid), ring->id, submitid,
> >               args->nr_bos, args->nr_cmds);
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> > index b912cacaecc0..0e4b45bff2e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.h
> > @@ -250,6 +250,59 @@ struct msm_gpu_perfcntr {
> >       const char *name;
> >   };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The number of priority levels provided by drm gpu scheduler.  The
> > + * DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL priority level is treated specially in some
> > + * cases, so we don't use it (no need for kernel generated jobs).
> > + */
> > +#define NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES (1 + DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH - DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * msm_gpu_convert_priority - Map userspace priority to ring # and sched priority
> > + *
> > + * @gpu:        the gpu instance
> > + * @prio:       the userspace priority level
> > + * @ring_nr:    [out] the ringbuffer the userspace priority maps to
> > + * @sched_prio: [out] the gpu scheduler priority level which the userspace
> > + *              priority maps to
> > + *
> > + * With drm/scheduler providing it's own level of prioritization, our total
> > + * number of available priority levels is (nr_rings * NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES).
> > + * Each ring is associated with it's own scheduler instance.  However, our
> > + * UABI is that lower numerical values are higher priority.  So mapping the
> > + * single userspace priority level into ring_nr and sched_prio takes some
> > + * care.  The userspace provided priority (when a submitqueue is created)
> > + * is mapped to ring nr and scheduler priority as such:
> > + *
> > + *   ring_nr    = userspace_prio / NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES
> > + *   sched_prio = NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES -
> > + *                (userspace_prio % NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES) - 1
> > + *
> > + * This allows generations without preemption (nr_rings==1) to have some
> > + * amount of prioritization, and provides more priority levels for gens
> > + * that do have preemption.
>
> I am exploring how different drivers handle priority levels and this
> caught my eye.
>
> Is the implication of the last paragraphs that on hw with nr_rings > 1,
> ring + 1 preempts ring?

Other way around, at least from the uabi standpoint.  Ie. ring[0]
preempts ring[1]

> If so I am wondering does the "spreading" of
> user visible priorities by NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES creates a non-preemptable
> levels within every "bucket" or how does that work?

So, preemption is possible between any priority level before run_job()
gets called, which writes the job into the ringbuffer.  After that
point, you only have "bucket" level preemption, because
NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES levels of priority get mapped to a single FIFO
ringbuffer.

-----

btw, one fun (but unrelated) issue I'm hitting with scheduler... I'm
trying to add an igt test to stress shrinker/eviction, similar to the
existing tests/i915/gem_shrink.c.  But we hit an unfortunate
combination of circumstances:
1. Pinning memory happens in the synchronous part of the submit ioctl,
before enqueuing the job for the kthread to handle.
2. The first run_job() callback incurs a slight delay (~1.5ms) while
resuming the GPU
3. Because of that delay, userspace has a chance to queue up enough
more jobs to require locking/pinning more than the available system
RAM..

I'm not sure if we want a way to prevent userspace from getting *too*
far ahead of the kthread.  Or maybe at some point the shrinker should
sleep on non-idle buffers?

BR,
-R

>
> Regards,
>
> Tvrtko
>
> > + */
> > +static inline int msm_gpu_convert_priority(struct msm_gpu *gpu, int prio,
> > +             unsigned *ring_nr, enum drm_sched_priority *sched_prio)
> > +{
> > +     unsigned rn, sp;
> > +
> > +     rn = div_u64_rem(prio, NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES, &sp);
> > +
> > +     /* invert sched priority to map to higher-numeric-is-higher-
> > +      * priority convention
> > +      */
> > +     sp = NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES - sp - 1;
> > +
> > +     if (rn >= gpu->nr_rings)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     *ring_nr = rn;
> > +     *sched_prio = sp;
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >   /**
> >    * A submitqueue is associated with a gl context or vk queue (or equiv)
> >    * in userspace.
> > @@ -257,7 +310,8 @@ struct msm_gpu_perfcntr {
> >    * @id:        userspace id for the submitqueue, unique within the drm_file
> >    * @flags:     userspace flags for the submitqueue, specified at creation
> >    *             (currently unusued)
> > - * @prio:      the submitqueue priority
> > + * @ring_nr:   the ringbuffer used by this submitqueue, which is determined
> > + *             by the submitqueue's priority
> >    * @faults:    the number of GPU hangs associated with this submitqueue
> >    * @ctx:       the per-drm_file context associated with the submitqueue (ie.
> >    *             which set of pgtables do submits jobs associated with the
> > @@ -272,7 +326,7 @@ struct msm_gpu_perfcntr {
> >   struct msm_gpu_submitqueue {
> >       int id;
> >       u32 flags;
> > -     u32 prio;
> > +     u32 ring_nr;
> >       int faults;
> >       struct msm_file_private *ctx;
> >       struct list_head node;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c
> > index 682ba2a7c0ec..32a55d81b58b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_submitqueue.c
> > @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ int msm_submitqueue_create(struct drm_device *drm, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> >       struct msm_gpu_submitqueue *queue;
> >       struct msm_ringbuffer *ring;
> >       struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched;
> > +     enum drm_sched_priority sched_prio;
> > +     unsigned ring_nr;
> >       int ret;
> >
> >       if (!ctx)
> > @@ -76,8 +78,9 @@ int msm_submitqueue_create(struct drm_device *drm, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> >       if (!priv->gpu)
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >
> > -     if (prio >= priv->gpu->nr_rings)
> > -             return -EINVAL;
> > +     ret = msm_gpu_convert_priority(priv->gpu, prio, &ring_nr, &sched_prio);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> >
> >       queue = kzalloc(sizeof(*queue), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > @@ -86,24 +89,13 @@ int msm_submitqueue_create(struct drm_device *drm, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> >
> >       kref_init(&queue->ref);
> >       queue->flags = flags;
> > -     queue->prio = prio;
> > +     queue->ring_nr = ring_nr;
> >
> > -     ring = priv->gpu->rb[prio];
> > +     ring = priv->gpu->rb[ring_nr];
> >       sched = &ring->sched;
> >
> > -     /*
> > -      * TODO we can allow more priorities than we have ringbuffers by
> > -      * mapping:
> > -      *
> > -      *    ring = prio / 3;
> > -      *    ent_prio = DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN + (prio % 3);
> > -      *
> > -      * Probably avoid using DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_KERNEL as that is
> > -      * treated specially in places.
> > -      */
> >       ret = drm_sched_entity_init(&queue->entity,
> > -                     DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_NORMAL,
> > -                     &sched, 1, NULL);
> > +                     sched_prio, &sched, 1, NULL);
> >       if (ret) {
> >               kfree(queue);
> >               return ret;
> > @@ -134,16 +126,19 @@ int msm_submitqueue_create(struct drm_device *drm, struct msm_file_private *ctx,
> >   int msm_submitqueue_init(struct drm_device *drm, struct msm_file_private *ctx)
> >   {
> >       struct msm_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
> > -     int default_prio;
> > +     int default_prio, max_priority;
> >
> >       if (!priv->gpu)
> >               return -ENODEV;
> >
> > +     max_priority = (priv->gpu->nr_rings * NR_SCHED_PRIORITIES) - 1;
> > +
> >       /*
> > -      * Select priority 2 as the "default priority" unless nr_rings is less
> > -      * than 2 and then pick the lowest priority
> > +      * Pick a medium priority level as default.  Lower numeric value is
> > +      * higher priority, so round-up to pick a priority that is not higher
> > +      * than the middle priority level.
> >        */
> > -     default_prio = clamp_t(uint32_t, 2, 0, priv->gpu->nr_rings - 1);
> > +     default_prio = DIV_ROUND_UP(max_priority, 2);
> >
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ctx->submitqueues);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> > index f075851021c3..6b8fffc28a50 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/drm/msm_drm.h
> > @@ -73,11 +73,19 @@ struct drm_msm_timespec {
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_MAX_FREQ   0x04
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_TIMESTAMP  0x05
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_GMEM_BASE  0x06
> > -#define MSM_PARAM_NR_RINGS   0x07
> > +#define MSM_PARAM_PRIORITIES 0x07  /* The # of priority levels */
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_PP_PGTABLE 0x08  /* => 1 for per-process pagetables, else 0 */
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_FAULTS     0x09
> >   #define MSM_PARAM_SUSPENDS   0x0a
> >
> > +/* For backwards compat.  The original support for preemption was based on
> > + * a single ring per priority level so # of priority levels equals the #
> > + * of rings.  With drm/scheduler providing additional levels of priority,
> > + * the number of priorities is greater than the # of rings.  The param is
> > + * renamed to better reflect this.
> > + */
> > +#define MSM_PARAM_NR_RINGS   MSM_PARAM_PRIORITIES
> > +
> >   struct drm_msm_param {
> >       __u32 pipe;           /* in, MSM_PIPE_x */
> >       __u32 param;          /* in, MSM_PARAM_x */
> > @@ -304,6 +312,10 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_madvise {
> >
> >   #define MSM_SUBMITQUEUE_FLAGS (0)
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The submitqueue priority should be between 0 and MSM_PARAM_PRIORITIES-1,
> > + * a lower numeric value is higher priority.
> > + */
> >   struct drm_msm_submitqueue {
> >       __u32 flags;   /* in, MSM_SUBMITQUEUE_x */
> >       __u32 prio;    /* in, Priority level */

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-23 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28  1:06 [PATCH v4 00/13] drm/msm: drm scheduler conversion and cleanups Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] drm/msm: Docs and misc cleanup Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] drm/msm: Small submitqueue creation cleanup Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] drm/msm: drop drm_gem_object_put_locked() Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] drm: Drop drm_gem_object_put_locked() Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] drm/msm/submit: Simplify out-fence-fd handling Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] drm/msm: Consolidate submit bo state Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] drm/msm: Track "seqno" fences by idr Rob Clark
2021-11-10 15:28   ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-11-10 16:55     ` Rob Clark
2021-11-11 15:53       ` Akhil P Oommen
2021-11-11 17:30         ` [Freedreno] " Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] drm/msm: Return ERR_PTR() from submit_create() Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] drm/msm: Conversion to drm scheduler Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] drm/msm: Drop submit bo_list Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] drm/msm: Drop struct_mutex in submit path Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/msm: Utilize gpu scheduler priorities Rob Clark
2022-05-23 14:45   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-23 22:53     ` Rob Clark [this message]
2022-05-24 13:45       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-24 14:50         ` Rob Clark
2022-05-25  9:46           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-25 13:41             ` Rob Clark
2022-05-25 16:22               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-26  3:37                 ` Rob Clark
2022-05-26 11:38                   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-27  4:25                     ` [Freedreno] " Rob Clark
2022-06-07 12:43                       ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-24 14:57         ` Rob Clark
2022-05-25  3:34           ` Rob Clark
2022-05-25 16:11           ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-26  3:15             ` Rob Clark
2022-05-26 13:29               ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2022-05-27  4:44                 ` Rob Clark
2021-07-28  1:06 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] drm/msm/gem: Mark active before pinning Rob Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJs_Fx6Nc337LPNh=p2GT2d2yDTdLWH934o4Cof3urDGhUJB6A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robdclark@chromium.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=akhilpo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jonathan@marek.ca \
    --cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=smasetty@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 12/13] drm/msm: Utilize gpu scheduler priorities' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).