Re: [PATCH v5, 00/15] Using component framework to support multi hardware decode

[Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>]

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 4:12 PM Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar> wrote:
>
> +danvet
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 23:58, Yunfei Dong <yunfei.dong@mediatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > This series adds support for multi hardware decode into mtk-vcodec, by first
> > adding component framework to manage each hardware information: interrupt,
> > clock, register bases and power. Secondly add core thread to deal with core
> > hardware message, at the same time, add msg queue for different hardware
> > share messages. Lastly, the architecture of different specs are not the same,
> > using specs type to separate them.
> >
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to introduce the component API in the
> media subsystem. It doesn't seem to be maintained, IRC there's not even
> a maintainer for it, and it has some issues that were never addressed.

Defacto dri-devel folks are maintainer component.c, but also I'm not
aware of anything missing there?

There has been discussions that in various drm subsystems like
drm_bridge or drm_panel a few things are missing, which prevent
drivers from moving _away_ from component.c to the more specific
solutions for panel/bridges. But nothing that's preventing them from
using component.c itself.

I'm happy to merge a MAINTAINERS patch to clarify the situation if
that's needed.
-Daniel

> It would be really important to avoid it. Is it really needed in the
> first place?
>
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch