Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] sched/fair: Consider SMT in ASYM_PACKING load balance

[Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>]

On Fri, 27 Aug 2021 at 21:45, Ricardo Neri
<ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 12:13:42PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 16:41, Ricardo Neri
> > <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > @@ -9540,6 +9629,12 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env,
> > >                     nr_running == 1)
> > >                         continue;
> > >
> > > +               /* Make sure we only pull tasks from a CPU of lower priority */
> > > +               if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING) &&
> > > +                   sched_asym_prefer(i, env->dst_cpu) &&
> > > +                   nr_running == 1)
> > > +                       continue;
> >
> > This really looks similar to the test above for SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY.
> > More generally speaking SD_ASYM_PACKING and SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY share
> > a lot of common policy and I wonder if at some point we could not
> > merge their behavior in LB
>
> I would like to confirm with you that you are not expecting this merge
> as part of this series, right?

Merging them will probably need more tests on both x86 and Arm so I
suppose that we could keep them separate for now

Regards,
Vincent

>
> Thanks and BR,
> Ricardo