From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753786AbbDBNvx (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:51:53 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com ([209.85.213.171]:33086 "EHLO mail-ig0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753019AbbDBNvu (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Apr 2015 09:51:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150402133715.GZ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <98b55223ab29cd5fb9b1f4a384cb7edd86578ea5.1427475606.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <20150402133715.GZ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:21:49 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] clockevents: Switch state to ONESHOT_STOPPED for unused clockevent devices From: Viresh Kumar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linaro Kernel Mailman List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kevin Hilman , Daniel Lezcano , Preeti U Murthy , Frederic Weisbecker Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2 April 2015 at 19:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Should we teach tick_program_event() about KTIME_MAX instead of adding > it to its callers? That's how I would have done, but Thomas (obviously for good reasons) rejected that :).. See reply to 2/3 for further details.