LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Viresh Kumar <>
To: Peter Zijlstra <>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: update '->active_bases' before calling hrtimer_force_reprogram()
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 19:23:31 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 2 April 2015 at 19:17, Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2015 at 04:21:21PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> 'active_bases' indicates which clock-base have active timers. While it
>> is updated (almost) correctly, it is hardly used. Next commit will start
>> using it to make code more efficient, but before that we need to fix a
>> problem.
>> While removing hrtimers, in __remove_hrtimer():
>> - We first remove the hrtimer from the queue.
>> - Then reprogram clockevent device if required
>>   (hrtimer_force_reprogram()).
>> - And then finally clear 'active_bases', if no more timers are pending
>>   on the current clock base (from which we are removing the hrtimer).
>> hrtimer_force_reprogram() needs to loop over all active clock bases to
>> find the next expiry event, and while doing so it will use
>> 'active_bases' (after next commit). And it will find the current base
>> active, as we haven't cleared it until now, even if current clock base
>> has no more hrtimers queued.
>> To fix this issue, clear active_bases before calling
>> hrtimer_force_reprogram().
> This is a small inefficiency right? Not an actual bug or anything.

So, what's explained in this patch is a BUG, which isn't harming us today.

But overall both patches combined are about improving on the small
inefficiency :)

Sorry for the political answer :)

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-02 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-02 10:51 [PATCH 0/2] hrtimer: Only iterate over active bases Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: update '->active_bases' before calling hrtimer_force_reprogram() Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02 13:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-02 13:53     ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-04-02 14:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-02 14:23         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] hrtimer: create for_each_active_base() to iterate over active clock-bases Viresh Kumar
2015-04-02 13:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-04-03  5:42     ` viresh kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: update '\''->active_bases'\'' before calling hrtimer_force_reprogram()' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).