LKML Archive on
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Guy <>
To: Arnd Bergmann <>
Cc: Russell King <>,
	Hartley Sweeten <>,
	Alexander Sverdlin <>,, Nikita Shubin <>,
	Arnd Bergmann <>, Oleg Nesterov <>,
	Hubert Feurstein <>,
	Lukasz Majewski <>,
	Catalin Marinas <>,
	Will Deacon <>,
	Nathan Chancellor <>,
	Nick Desaulniers <>,
	Linus Walleij <>,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ep93xx: remove MaverickCrunch support
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2021 17:45:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 02/08/2021, Arnd Bergmann <> wrote:
> The MaverickCrunch support for ep93xx never made it into glibc

This is true, but is not needed except for preserving FP registers in
catch/throw exeptions or longjmps.

> was removed from gcc in its 4.8 release in 2012.

I was sad about that, as I had managed to get it working correctly in
4.2 4.3 and 4.4.
Unfortunately the GCC ARM maintainer at the time was paid by ARM, and
they had no interest in it, as I gather the ARM-Cirrus partnership
ended up disappointingly.

> It is now one of
> the last parts of arch/arm/ that fails to build with the clang
> integrated assembler

Even if crunch support is not configured?

> According to Hartley Sweeten:
>  "Martin Guy did a lot of work trying to get the maverick crunch working
>   but I was never able to successfully use it for anything.

>   It "kind" of works but depending on the EP93xx silicon revision

It works fine on all production revisions except D0 (the first one)
which is so rare as to be unfindable. All the others from D1 on have
the exact same HW bugs.

>   there are still a number of hardware bugs that either give imprecise or garbage results.

Not my experience, See
If "imprecise" means "doesn't handle unnormalized FP values correctly"
then yes, that's a feature if you need the 2.5 to 4gimes speedup it
But I would be interested (Hartley) if you have a concrete example.

> This touches mostly the ep93xx platform,

The ep93xx is the only chip series it was ever included in.

> If there are remaining users of MaverickCrunch, they can use LTS
> kernels for at least another five years before kernel support ends.

The only user ! am aware of is the HEAT deep space telescope in the Antarctic

Personally I have no problem with removing kernel support if that
makes people's lives easier in some way.



       reply	other threads:[~2021-08-02 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <>
2021-08-02 15:45 ` Martin Guy [this message]
2021-08-03 11:40   ` Martin Guy
     [not found]     ` <>
2021-08-03 15:52       ` Jerome Oufella
2021-08-03 12:12   ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] ARM: ep93xx: remove MaverickCrunch support' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).