From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753124AbeDQMld (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:41:33 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f44.google.com ([209.85.214.44]:53962 "EHLO mail-it0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbeDQMlb (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:41:31 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+l80K/2s7HvjBZGS02FWMBRbXLSiFpo7EBriKnAqA9F57Lu1ImdQR/ybtSFy73FkWxDx5tZw1JgkyqOe8bNXU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180417102917.7794-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <2a2ac117-900c-77b6-f247-49777493e55f@ti.com> From: Bartosz Golaszewski Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 14:41:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: davinci: remove the mach-specific aemif driver - part 1 To: Bartosz Golaszewski Cc: Sekhar Nori , Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Santosh Shilimkar , arm-soc , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2018-04-17 14:36 GMT+02:00 Bartosz Golaszewski : > 2018-04-17 12:53 GMT+02:00 Sekhar Nori : >> Hi Bartosz, >> >> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 03:59 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski >>> >>> This is the first part of changes required to remove duplicate aemif >>> support from mach-davinci. >>> >>> I actually noticed that one of my previous changes from 2017 broke nand >>> in legacy mode - the clock lookup no longer works. This series addresses >>> it as well. >>> >>> First patch just uses a static string for the ti-aemif driver name. >>> >>> The second adds support for board files to the aemif driver. >>> >>> Last two add nand support to da850-lcdk in legacy mode and make >>> da850-evm use the platform driver instead of the mach-specific one. >>> >>> If these patches get accepted, I'll prepere a follow-up moving all >>> other boards to the new platform driver. >>> >>> This series applies on top of v8 of David Lechner's CCF series. >> >> Are there any patches in the series that can safely be applied to v4.17-rc1? >> >> Thanks, >> Sekhar > > Hi Sekhar, > > yes, all of them. They're not linked to David's work in any way. > > Bart Oops, -ETOOFAST, I rebased it on top of David's v9, let me check how it works with mainline - it should be mostly fine. Bart