Re: imx_v6_v7_defconfig needs lzop

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:41:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12358024/
>> >>
>> >> /bin/sh: 1: lzop: not found
>> >> cat: write error: Broken pipe
>> >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.lzo] Error 1
>> >
>> > Isn't this error happening due to the lack of 'lzop' package installed
>> > on the host machine?
>>
>> Indeed.
> I guess you don't want to ask for help or report a build breakage, but
> question if it's sensible to let a defconfig depend on a host tool that
> isn't commonly installed, right?

Right.

The maintainers of the host machines were in the To-header, in the hope they
would install the missing tool.
The arm people were in the Cc-header, so they can question their defconfig.

Sorry, I should have been clearer from the beginning.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds