LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>, USB <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2018 19:25:13 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMz4kuJpBXY92zhG7s_VRkpcTHeLCE_vBLLSFVxLWjN2GQvyyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <8ec0485e-89af-568b-e34a-b0cd490817d0@ti.com> On 5 March 2018 at 19:14, Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> wrote: > On 05/03/18 13:06, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linaro.org> writes: >>>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes: >>>>>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes: >>>>>>>> In the following test we get stuck by sleeping forever in _dwc3_set_mode() >>>>>>>> after which dual-role switching doesn't work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On dra7-evm's dual-role port, >>>>>>>> - Load g_zero gadget driver and enumerate to host >>>>>>>> - suspend to mem >>>>>>>> - disconnect USB cable to host and connect otg cable with Pen drive in it. >>>>>>>> - resume system >>>>>>>> - we sleep indefinitely in _dwc3_set_mode due to. >>>>>>>> dwc3_gadget_exit()->usb_del_gadget_udc()->udc_stop()-> >>>>>>>> dwc3_gadget_stop()->wait_event_lock_irq() >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let's clear the DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING flag on all endpoints >>>>>>>> so we don't wait in dwc3_gadget_stop(). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >>>>>>>> index 2bda4eb..0a360da 100644 >>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/gadget.c >>>>>>>> @@ -3273,6 +3273,20 @@ int dwc3_gadget_init(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> void dwc3_gadget_exit(struct dwc3 *dwc) >>>>>>>> { >>>>>>>> + int epnum; >>>>>>>> + unsigned long flags; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dwc->lock, flags); >>>>>>>> + for (epnum = 2; epnum < DWC3_ENDPOINTS_NUM; epnum++) { >>>>>>>> + struct dwc3_ep *dep = dwc->eps[epnum]; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + if (!dep) >>>>>>>> + continue; >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> + dep->flags &= ~DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING; >>>>>>>> + } >>>>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dwc->lock, flags); >>>>>>>> + >>>>>>>> usb_del_gadget_udc(&dwc->gadget); >>>>>>>> dwc3_gadget_free_endpoints(dwc); >>>>>>> >>>>>>> free endpoints is a better place for this. It's already going to free >>>>>>> the memory anyway. Might as well clear all flags to 0 there. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> But it won't solve the deadlock issue. Since dwc3_gadget_free_endpoints() >>>>>> is called after usb_del_gadget_udc() and the deadlock happens when >>>>>> >>>>>> usb_del_gadget_udc()->udc_stop()->dwc3_gadget_stop()->wait_event_lock_irq() >>>>>> >>>>>> and DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING flag is set. >>>>> >>>>> indeed. Iterating twice over the entire endpoint list seems >>>>> wasteful. Perhaps we just shouldn't wait when removing the UDC since >>>>> that's essentially what this patch will do, right? If you clear the flag >>>>> before calling ->udc_stop(), this means the loop in dwc3_gadget_stop() >>>>> will do nothing. Might as well remove it. >>>>> >>>> >>>> This means that we will never wait for DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING to clear >>>> in dwc3_gadget_stop() like we used to. This is perfectly fine, right? >>>> >>>> It makes sense to me as dwc3_gadget_stop() calls __dwc3_gadget_stop() which >>>> masks all interrupts and nobody will ever clear that flag if it was set. >>> >>> I don't think so. It can not mask the endpoint events, please check >>> the events which will be masked in DEVTEN register. The reason why we >>> should wait for DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING to clear is that, >>> sometimes the DWC3_DEPEVT_EPCMDCMPLT event will be triggered later >>> than 100us, but now we may have freed the gadget irq which will cause >>> crash. >> >> We could mask command complete events as soon as ->udc_stop() is called, >> right? Hmm, actually, __dwc3_gadget_stop() already clears DEVTEN >> completely. > > But which bit in DEVTEN says Endpoint events are disabled? When we set up the DWC3_DEPCMD_ENDTRANSFER command in dwc3_stop_active_transfer(), we can do not set DWC3_DEPCMD_CMDIOC, then there will no endpoint command complete interrupts I think. cmd |= DWC3_DEPCMD_CMDIOC; > >> >> /me goes check databook >> >> At least on revision 2.60a of the databook, bit 10 is reserved. I wonder >> if that's the start of all the problems. Anybody has access to older and >> newer databook revisions so we can cross-check? >> > > I can access v2.40 and v3.10 books. > > bit 10 is reserved on both > > Differences in v2.4 vs v3.10 are: > > bit 8 reserved vs L1SUSPEN > bit 13 reserved vs StopOnDisconnectEn > bit 14 reserved vs L1WKUPEVTEN > > -- > cheers, > -roger > > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki -- Baolin.wang Best Regards
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-05 11:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-02-27 11:22 [PATCH] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume Roger Quadros 2018-02-28 3:04 ` Baolin Wang 2018-02-28 9:55 ` Roger Quadros 2018-02-28 7:53 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-02-28 9:59 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-05 8:49 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-05 9:45 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-05 10:41 ` Baolin Wang 2018-03-05 11:03 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-05 11:06 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-05 11:14 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-05 11:25 ` Baolin Wang [this message] 2018-03-05 11:27 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-09 9:19 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-09 9:23 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-09 9:26 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-09 9:49 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-09 10:39 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-09 10:36 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-05 11:25 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-09 12:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros 2018-03-16 10:34 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-16 11:00 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-16 11:03 ` Roger Quadros 2018-03-16 11:43 ` Minas Harutyunyan 2018-03-16 12:25 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-17 6:33 ` Minas Harutyunyan 2018-03-19 8:54 ` Felipe Balbi 2018-03-19 11:36 ` Minas Harutyunyan 2018-03-19 13:53 ` Minas Harutyunyan 2018-04-10 6:29 ` Minas Harutyunyan 2018-04-10 7:31 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAMz4kuJpBXY92zhG7s_VRkpcTHeLCE_vBLLSFVxLWjN2GQvyyw@mail.gmail.com \ --to=baolin.wang@linaro.org \ --cc=balbi@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=rogerq@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).