LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@google.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com,
chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com, johan@kernel.org,
arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@google.com>,
anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
keescook@chromium.org, mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com,
felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com, ekorenevsky@gmail.com,
peter.chen@nxp.com, joe@perches.com,
Todd Broch <tbroch@google.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@google.com>, Benson Leung <bleung@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] USB: Increment wakeup count on remote wakeup.
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 10:07:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOGSYL3umc6xD4sJDGcUh44-hs-ctLRQXaH5oMaD8riKMYk73g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1804201010110.1407-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 7:12 AM, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Ravi Chandra Sadineni wrote:
>
>> On chromebooks we depend on wakeup count to identify the wakeup source.
>> But currently USB devices do not increment the wakeup count when they
>> trigger the remote wake. This patch addresses the same.
>>
>> Resume condition is reported differently on USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 devices.
>>
>> On USB 2.0 devices, a wake capable device, if wake enabled, drives
>> resume signal to indicate a remote wake (USB 2.0 spec section 7.1.7.7).
>> The upstream facing port then sets C_PORT_SUSPEND bit and reports a
>> port change event (USB 2.0 spec section 11.24.2.7.2.3). Thus if a port
>> has resumed before driving the resume signal from the host and
>> C_PORT_SUSPEND is set, then the device attached to the given port might
>> be the reason for the last system wakeup. Increment the wakeup count for
>> the same.
>>
>> On USB 3.0 devices, a function may signal that it wants to exit from device
>> suspend by sending a Function Wake Device Notification to the host (USB3.0
>> spec section 8.5.6.4) Thus on receiving the Function Wake, increment the
>> wakeup count.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@chromium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> index 777036ae63674..ee0f3ec57ce49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> @@ -2374,7 +2374,9 @@ static void hcd_resume_work(struct work_struct *work)
>> void usb_hcd_resume_root_hub (struct usb_hcd *hcd)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> + struct device *dev = &hcd->self.root_hub->dev;
>>
>> + pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);
>> spin_lock_irqsave (&hcd_root_hub_lock, flags);
>> if (hcd->rh_registered) {
>> set_bit(HCD_FLAG_WAKEUP_PENDING, &hcd->flags);
>
> In general, hcd->self.root_hub is guaranteed to be non-NULL only when
> hcd->rh_registered is set. Therefore the assignment to dev and the
> call to pm_wakeup_event() should be moved within this "if" statement.
>
> The rest of the patch looks okay.
Added the check in V3. Thanks.
>
> Alan Stern
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> index f6ea16e9f6bb9..aa9968d90a48c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
>> @@ -653,12 +653,17 @@ void usb_wakeup_notification(struct usb_device *hdev,
>> unsigned int portnum)
>> {
>> struct usb_hub *hub;
>> + struct usb_port *port_dev;
>>
>> if (!hdev)
>> return;
>>
>> hub = usb_hub_to_struct_hub(hdev);
>> if (hub) {
>> + port_dev = hub->ports[portnum - 1];
>> + if (port_dev && port_dev->child)
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&port_dev->child->dev, 0);
>> +
>> set_bit(portnum, hub->wakeup_bits);
>> kick_hub_wq(hub);
>> }
>> @@ -3434,8 +3439,11 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, pm_message_t msg)
>>
>> /* Skip the initial Clear-Suspend step for a remote wakeup */
>> status = hub_port_status(hub, port1, &portstatus, &portchange);
>> - if (status == 0 && !port_is_suspended(hub, portstatus))
>> + if (status == 0 && !port_is_suspended(hub, portstatus)) {
>> + if (portchange & USB_PORT_STAT_C_SUSPEND)
>> + pm_wakeup_event(&udev->dev, 0);
>> goto SuspendCleared;
>> + }
>>
>> /* see 7.1.7.7; affects power usage, but not budgeting */
>> if (hub_is_superspeed(hub->hdev))
>>
>
Thanks,
Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-20 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-19 0:18 [PATCH] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-19 9:30 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-19 9:33 ` kbuild test robot
2018-04-19 15:01 ` Alan Stern
2018-04-19 16:17 ` Rajat Jain
2018-04-20 0:27 ` [PATCH V2] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 14:12 ` Alan Stern
2018-04-20 17:05 ` [PATCH V3] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 17:29 ` Alan Stern
2018-04-20 17:54 ` [PATCH V4] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 18:08 ` [PATCH V5] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 18:22 ` Alan Stern
2018-04-21 8:59 ` Greg KH
2018-04-21 13:37 ` Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 18:12 ` [PATCH V3] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
2018-04-20 17:07 ` Ravi Chandra Sadineni [this message]
2018-04-20 0:50 ` [PATCH] " Ravi Chandra Sadineni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOGSYL3umc6xD4sJDGcUh44-hs-ctLRQXaH5oMaD8riKMYk73g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ravisadineni@google.com \
--cc=anton.bondarenko.sama@gmail.com \
--cc=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=bleung@google.com \
--cc=chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com \
--cc=dtor@google.com \
--cc=ekorenevsky@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=peter.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=rajatja@google.com \
--cc=ravisadineni@chromium.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tbroch@google.com \
--subject='Re: [PATCH V2] USB: Increment wakeup count on remote wakeup.' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).