Re: [PATCH] mmc: Add hardware dependencies for sdhci-pxav3 and sdhci-pxav2

[Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>]

On 29 January 2015 at 15:17, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:04:24 +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 27 January 2015 at 15:34, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
>> > Hi Ulf,
>> >
>> > Le Tuesday 27 January 2015 à 15:06 +0100, Ulf Hansson a écrit :
>> >> On 26 January 2015 at 11:23, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de> wrote:
>> >> > I seem to understand that the sdhci-pxav3 and sdhci-pxav2 drivers are
>> >> > only needed on the MMP architecture. So add a hardware dependency on
>> >> > ARCH_MMP, so that other users don't get to build useless drivers.
>> >>
>> >> I would rather see the default option to be N.
>> >> Thus those configurations that needs this driver will have to select it.
>> >
>> > This is a different question. The purpose of my patch is that people
>> > configuring kernels for systems which just can't have these controllers,
>> > are not asked about this driver at all. Changing the default to N would
>> > not achieve that.
>>
>> For those SOC that want these drivers, they should be able to select
>> them from their defconfigs. So it will be an opt-in instead of opt-out
>> policy, which I prefer. It also follows the other Kconfig options for
>> mmc drivers.
>
> As you wish. But that change would be a separate patch going on top of
> mine, right? I'm not sure I understand what you expect from me at this
> point, please clarify.

Sorry for being unclear. I don't like $subject patch.

Send a new one, removing the following lines:
default CPU_MMP2
default CPU_PXA910

Then you send another patch(es) to the respective SOC maintainer,
updating the defonfig(s) selecting MMC_SDHCI_PXAV3|PXAV2, when
appropriate.

Would that work?

Kind regards
Uffe