LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
	"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Yu C" <yu.c.zhang@intel.com>,
	"Pankaj Gupta" <pagupta@redhat.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>, "Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Zhang, Yi Z" <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 4/4] kvm: add a check if pfn is from NVDIMM pmem.
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 14:19:17 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4g6OS=_uSjJenn5WVmpx7zCRCbzJaBr_m0Bq=qyEyVagg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180920224953.GA53363@tiger-server>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 7:11 AM Yi Zhang <yi.z.zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-19 at 09:20:25 +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > Am 19.09.18 um 04:53 schrieb Dan Williams:
> > >
> > > Should we consider just not setting PageReserved for
> > > devm_memremap_pages()? Perhaps kvm is not be the only component making
> > > these assumptions about this flag?
> >
> > I was asking the exact same question in v3 or so.
> >
> > I was recently going through all PageReserved users, trying to clean up
> > and document how it is used.
> >
> > PG_reserved used to be a marker "not available for the page allocator".
> > This is only partially true and not really helpful I think. My current
> > understanding:
> >
> > "
> > PG_reserved is set for special pages, struct pages of such pages should
> > in general not be touched except by their owner. Pages marked as
> > reserved include:
> > - Kernel image (including vDSO) and similar (e.g. BIOS, initrd)
> > - Pages allocated early during boot (bootmem, memblock)
> > - Zero pages
> > - Pages that have been associated with a zone but were not onlined
> >   (e.g. NVDIMM/pmem, online_page_callback used by XEN)
> > - Pages to exclude from the hibernation image (e.g. loaded kexec images)
> > - MCA (memory error) pages on ia64
> > - Offline pages
> > Some architectures don't allow to ioremap RAM pages that are not marked
> > as reserved. Allocated pages might have to be set reserved to allow for
> > that - if there is a good reason to enforce this. Consequently,
> > PG_reserved part of a user space table might be the indicator for the
> > zero page, pmem or MMIO pages.
> > "
> >
> > Swapping code does not care about PageReserved at all as far as I
> > remember. This seems to be fine as it only looks at the way pages have
> > been mapped into user space.
> >
> > I don't really see a good reason to set pmem pages as reserved. One
> > question would be, how/if to exclude them from the hibernation image.
> > But that could also be solved differently (we would have to double check
> > how they are handled in hibernation code).
> >
> >
> > A similar user of PageReserved to look at is:
> >
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c:is_invalid_reserved_pfn()
> >
> > It will not mark pages dirty if they are reserved. Similar to KVM code.
> Yes, kvm is not the only one user of the dax reserved page.
> >
> > >
> > > Why is MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC memory specifically excluded?
> > >
> > > This has less to do with "dax" pages and more to do with
> > > devm_memremap_pages() established ranges. P2PDMA is another producer
> > > of these pages. If either MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC or P2PDMA pages can be
> > > used in these kvm paths then I think this points to consider clearing
> > > the Reserved flag.
>
> Thanks Dan/David's comments.
> for MEMORY_DEVICE_PUBLIC memory, since host driver could manager the
> memory resource to share to guest, Jerome says we could ignore it at
> this time.
>
> And p2pmem, it seems mapped in a PCI bar space which should most likely
> a mmio. I think kvm should treated as a reserved page.

Ok, but the question you left unanswered is whether it would be better
for devm_memremap_pages() to clear the PageReserved flag for
MEMORY_DEVICE_{FS,DEV}_DAX rather than introduce a local kvm-only hack
for what looks like a global problem.

  reply index

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 18:03 [PATCH V5 0/4] Fix kvm misconceives NVDIMM pages as reserved mmio Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 17:04 ` Ahmed S. Darwish
2018-09-18 14:31   ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 1/4] kvm: remove redundant reserved page check Zhang Yi
2018-10-24 14:32   ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 2/4] mm: introduce memory type MEMORY_DEVICE_DEV_DAX Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 18:03 ` [PATCH V5 3/4] mm: add a function to differentiate the pages is from DAX device memory Zhang Yi
2018-09-07 18:04 ` [PATCH V5 4/4] kvm: add a check if pfn is from NVDIMM pmem Zhang Yi
2018-09-19  2:53   ` Dan Williams
2018-09-19  7:20     ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-20 22:49       ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-20 21:19         ` Dan Williams [this message]
2018-09-21 22:47           ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-21 14:23             ` David Hildenbrand
2018-09-21 18:17               ` Dan Williams
2018-09-21 19:29                 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-10-19 16:33                   ` Barret Rhoden
2018-10-22  8:47                     ` Yi Zhang
2018-09-19 10:55 ` [PATCH V5 0/4] Fix kvm misconceives NVDIMM pages as reserved mmio Yi Zhang
2018-09-19  2:43   ` Pankaj Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4g6OS=_uSjJenn5WVmpx7zCRCbzJaBr_m0Bq=qyEyVagg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    --cc=pagupta@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=yu.c.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/0 lkml/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/1 lkml/git/1.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/2 lkml/git/2.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/3 lkml/git/3.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/4 lkml/git/4.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/5 lkml/git/5.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/6 lkml/git/6.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/7 lkml/git/7.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/8 lkml/git/8.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/9 lkml/git/9.git
	git clone --mirror https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/10 lkml/git/10.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 lkml lkml/ https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml \
		linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index lkml

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git