From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758120AbbA0KSL (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:18:11 -0500 Received: from mail-lb0-f182.google.com ([209.85.217.182]:39555 "EHLO mail-lb0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757589AbbA0KSE (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:18:04 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150127001419.GO21293@sirena.org.uk> References: <1422029330-10971-1-git-send-email-ricardo.ribalda@gmail.com> <20150127001419.GO21293@sirena.org.uk> From: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:17:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] spi/xilinx: Speed-up To: Mark Brown Cc: Michal Simek , =?UTF-8?Q?S=C3=B6ren_Brinkmann?= , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, "moderated list:ARM/S5P EXYNOS AR..." , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Mark On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:14 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > In general the best way to present a series is to start off with any bug > fixes (so they can be sent to Linus and stable if needed), then move on > to mechanical and stylistic cleanups (since they tend to be easy to > review and apply) and finally move on to new functionality (since that > is most likely to run into review problems and the cleanups should help > review). Will try to follow that pattern the next time. The development of the patchset has been a bit chaotic. I opened up the code to support more modes and then I realize that I could improve the poor performance I was having with the driver.... > >> spi/xilinx: Support for spi mode LOOP >> spi/xilinx: Simplify data read from the Rx FIFO >> spi-xilinx: Simplify spi_fill_tx_fifo > > spi-xilinx? Thanks! Fixed on the next version. BTW what is preferred spi/xilinx: or spi: xilinx: ?I have seen both naming. Thanks! -- Ricardo Ribalda