LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Clarification needed regarding memory barrier
@ 2015-02-18 15:09 Ayyappa Ch
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Ayyappa Ch @ 2015-02-18 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello All,
I am reading memory-barrier.txt file as mentioned below.
Please clarify my doubt .
1) For example if CPU1 got the lock , How PCI bridge can see STORE
*ADDR = 4 before STORE *DATA = 1?
ACQUIRES VS I/O ACCESSES
------------------------
Under certain circumstances (especially involving NUMA), I/O accesses within
two spinlocked sections on two different CPUs may be seen as interleaved by the
PCI bridge, because the PCI bridge does not necessarily participate in the
cache-coherence protocol, and is therefore incapable of issuing the required
read memory barriers.
For example:
CPU 1
===============================
spin_lock(Q)
writel(0, ADDR)
writel(1, DATA);
spin_unlock(Q);
CPU 2
===============================
spin_lock(Q);
writel(4, ADDR);
writel(5, DATA);
spin_unlock(Q);
may be seen by the PCI bridge as follows:
STORE *ADDR = 0, STORE *ADDR = 4, STORE *DATA = 1, STORE *DATA = 5
which would probably cause the hardware to malfunction.
Thanks and regards,
Ayyappa.Ch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-02-18 15:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-02-18 15:09 Clarification needed regarding memory barrier Ayyappa Ch
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).