From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261500AbUE3Bll (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 21:41:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261551AbUE3Bll (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 21:41:41 -0400 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([193.197.184.2]:3292 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261500AbUE3Blk (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 May 2004 21:41:40 -0400 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3 probem in 2.4.25 with 4 procs? Organization: Deban GNU/Linux Homesite In-Reply-To: <20040530001212.GI24213@rdlg.net> X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.7.4-20040225 ("Benbecula") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.5 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 03:41:38 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article <20040530001212.GI24213@rdlg.net> you wrote: > "du -h" and "df -h" report a 1 Gig difference. du and df calculate the used sizes quite differently. 10% differences are quite common. I dont think this is related to 4 proc nor the kernel version. All filesystems more or less show those differences. Greetings Bernd -- eckes privat - http://www.eckes.org/ Project Freefire - http://www.freefire.org/