LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: serue@us.ibm.com
Cc: miklos@szeredi.hu, serge@hallyn.com, hpa@zytor.com,
linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] unprivileged mounts update
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:29:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1Hh6qi-0002LI-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070426161929.GA6439@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (serue@us.ibm.com)
> So then as far as you're concerned, the patches which were in -mm will
> remain unchanged?
Basically yes. I've merged the update patch, which was not yet added
to -mm, did some cosmetic code changes, and updated the patch headers.
There's one open point, that I think we haven't really explored, and
that is the propagation semantics. I think you had the idea, that a
propagated mount should inherit ownership from the parent into which
it was propagated.
That sounds good if everyone agrees?
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-26 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 7:45 Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-25 15:18 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-25 16:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-04-25 17:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-25 17:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-25 17:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-25 18:41 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-25 18:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-25 19:33 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-26 14:57 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-26 15:23 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-26 16:19 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-26 16:29 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2007-04-26 19:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-26 19:56 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-27 2:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-25 17:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-25 17:30 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-04-26 19:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-26 20:27 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-04-27 4:10 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-27 7:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-25 19:33 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-25 19:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1Hh6qi-0002LI-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
--subject='Re: [patch] unprivileged mounts update' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).