From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752463AbXDZQbH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:31:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752674AbXDZQbH (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:31:07 -0400 Received: from mail-gw2.sa.eol.hu ([212.108.200.109]:44677 "EHLO mail-gw2.sa.eol.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbXDZQbF (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:31:05 -0400 To: serue@us.ibm.com CC: miklos@szeredi.hu, serge@hallyn.com, hpa@zytor.com, linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org In-reply-to: <20070426161929.GA6439@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (serue@us.ibm.com) Subject: Re: [patch] unprivileged mounts update References: <462F87EA.1000002@zytor.com> <20070425172012.GA20336@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070425175609.GB20165@vino.hallyn.com> <20070425185244.GA20688@vino.hallyn.com> <20070426145733.GA10078@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <20070426161929.GA6439@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 18:29:40 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So then as far as you're concerned, the patches which were in -mm will > remain unchanged? Basically yes. I've merged the update patch, which was not yet added to -mm, did some cosmetic code changes, and updated the patch headers. There's one open point, that I think we haven't really explored, and that is the propagation semantics. I think you had the idea, that a propagated mount should inherit ownership from the parent into which it was propagated. That sounds good if everyone agrees? Miklos