LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5] Optimize page_mkclean_one
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:29:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1I4wgB-00071r-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070629141528.511942868@de.ibm.com> (message from Martin Schwidefsky on Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:55:35 +0200)
> page_mkclean_one is used to clear the dirty bit and to set the write
> protect bit of a pte. In additions it returns true if the pte either
> has been dirty or if it has been writable. As far as I can see the
> function should return true only if the pte has been dirty, or page
> writeback will needlessly write a clean page.
There are some weird cases, like for example get_user_pages(), when
the pte takes a write fault and the page is modified, but the pte
doesn't become dirty, because the page is written through the kernel
mapping.
In the get_user_pages() case the page itself is dirtied, so your patch
probably doesn't break that. But I'm not sure if there aren't similar
cases like that that the pte_write() check is taking care of.
And anyway if the dirty page tracking works correctly, your patch
won't optimize anything, since the pte will _only_ become writable if
the page was dirtied.
So in fact normally pte_dirty() and pte_write() should be equivalent,
except for some weird cases.
Miklos
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-01 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-29 13:55 [patch 0/5] Various mm improvements Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-29 13:55 ` [patch 1/5] avoid tlb gather restarts Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-29 18:56 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-29 21:19 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-30 13:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-06-29 13:55 ` [patch 2/5] remove ptep_establish Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-29 13:55 ` [patch 3/5] remove ptep_test_and_clear_dirty and ptep_clear_flush_dirty Martin Schwidefsky
2007-07-03 1:29 ` Zachary Amsden
2007-07-03 7:26 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-29 13:55 ` [patch 4/5] move mm_struct and vm_area_struct Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-29 13:55 ` [patch 5/5] Optimize page_mkclean_one Martin Schwidefsky
2007-06-30 14:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-01 7:15 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-07-01 8:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-01 13:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-02 7:07 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-07-01 19:50 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2007-07-01 10:29 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1I4wgB-00071r-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu \
--to=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--subject='Re: [patch 5/5] Optimize page_mkclean_one' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).