LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>,
"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>
Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/4] hyperv: netvsc: improve protection against rescind offer
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:29:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F792CF86EFE20D4AB8064279AFBA51C61F33A63D@HKNPRD3002MB017.064d.mgd.msft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1422982839-3948-5-git-send-email-vkuznets@redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Vitaly Kuznetsov [mailto:vkuznets@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 1:01 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan; devel@linuxdriverproject.org
> Cc: Haiyang Zhang; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Dexuan Cui; Jason Wang
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] hyperv: netvsc: improve protection against rescind offer
>
> The check added in commit c3582a2c4d0b ("hyperv: Add support for vNIC hot
> removal") is incomplete as there is no synchronization between
> vmbus_onoffer_rescind() and netvsc_send(). In case we get the offer after we
> checked out_channel->rescind and before netvsc_send() finishes its job we can
> get a crash as we'll be dealing with already freed channel.
>
> Make netvsc_send() take additional reference to the channel with newly
> introduced vmbus_get_channel(), this guarantees we won't lose the channel.
> We
> can still get rescind while we're processing but this won't cause a crash.
>
> Reported-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c | 10 ++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> index 9f49c01..d9b13a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c
> @@ -763,11 +763,16 @@ int netvsc_send(struct hv_device *device,
> out_channel = net_device->chn_table[packet->q_idx];
> if (out_channel == NULL)
> out_channel = device->channel;
> - packet->channel = out_channel;
> + packet->channel = vmbus_get_channel(out_channel);
>
> - if (out_channel->rescind)
> + if (!packet->channel)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> + if (out_channel->rescind) {
> + vmbus_put_channel(out_channel);
IMO the patch doesn't resolve the real issue.
At most it prevents the channel from disappearing in netvsc_send() only,
while actually we also need to make sure the channel is not freed before the
driver runs netvsc_remove() -> rndis_filter_device_remove() ->
-> netvsc_device_remove() -> vmbus_close().
I suggest we add vmbus_get/put_channel() in vmbus_open/close()?
-- Dexuan
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> if (packet->page_buf_cnt) {
> ret = vmbus_sendpacket_pagebuffer(out_channel,
> packet->page_buf,
> @@ -810,6 +815,7 @@ int netvsc_send(struct hv_device *device,
> packet, ret);
> }
>
> + vmbus_put_channel(packet->channel);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 7:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-03 17:00 [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: hv: Further protection for the rescind path Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-03 17:00 ` [PATCH 1/4] Drivers: hv: vmbus: implement get/put usage workflow for vmbus channels Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-04 8:18 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-04 9:32 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-04 9:54 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-04 9:14 ` Jason Wang
2015-02-04 9:33 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-03 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/4] Drivers: hv: vmbus: do not lose rescind offer on failure in vmbus_process_offer() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-04 7:42 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-03 17:00 ` [PATCH 3/4] Drivers: hv: vmbus: protect vmbus_get_outgoing_channel() against channel removal Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-04 7:27 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-03 17:00 ` [PATCH 4/4] hyperv: netvsc: improve protection against rescind offer Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-04 7:29 ` Dexuan Cui [this message]
2015-02-04 18:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] Drivers: hv: Further protection for the rescind path KY Srinivasan
2015-02-05 10:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-02-05 12:44 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-05 22:47 ` KY Srinivasan
2015-02-06 14:53 ` Dexuan Cui
2015-02-07 16:27 ` KY Srinivasan
2015-02-05 15:52 ` KY Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F792CF86EFE20D4AB8064279AFBA51C61F33A63D@HKNPRD3002MB017.064d.mgd.msft.net \
--to=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--subject='RE: [PATCH 4/4] hyperv: netvsc: improve protection against rescind offer' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).