From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264499AbUEUX6A (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 19:58:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265252AbUEUXvz (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 19:51:55 -0400 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([204.152.189.113]:8380 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265108AbUEUXaX (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2004 19:30:23 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:48:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Tim Bird cc: Adrian Bunk , linux kernel Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: CE Linux Forum - Specification V1.0 draft In-Reply-To: <40ABC5AF.6070109@am.sony.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 19 May 2004, Tim Bird wrote: > Verifying that something is supported correctly on multiple > architectures is not simple. Yes, we know that the default > optimization level for ARM is -Os. As recently as last month, > there was a problem report about -Os on the gcc mailing list. Incidentally, with all gcc-3.* in existence today, the kernel gets miscompiled if -Os is not used on ARM due to a gcc bug. But this is not the reason why -Os was chosen as default on ARM though. Nicolas