LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* /net/tipc/port.c: Use tipc_port_unlock
@ 2008-01-04 14:47 Julia Lawall
2008-01-08 15:34 ` RE : [tipc-discussion] " Jon Paul Maloy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2008-01-04 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: per.liden, jon.maloy, allan.stephens, tipc-discussion,
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
The file net/tipc/port.c takes a lock using the function tipc_port_lock and
then releases the lock sometimes using tipc_port_unlock and sometimes using
spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock). tipc_port_unlock simply does the
spin_unlock_bh, but it seems cleaner to use it everywhere.
The problem was fixed using the following semantic patch.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@
struct port *p_ptr;
@@
p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...)
...
(
p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...);
|
?- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
diff -u -p a/net/tipc/port.c b/net/tipc/port.c
--- a/net/tipc/port.c 2008-01-01 10:43:55.000000000 +0100
+++ b/net/tipc/port.c 2008-01-04 10:51:05.000000000 +0100
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ int tipc_portunreliable(u32 ref, unsigne
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*isunreliable = port_unreliable(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int tipc_portunreturnable(u32 ref, unsig
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*isunrejectable = port_unreturnable(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static void port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(!connected)) {
if (unlikely(published))
goto reject;
@@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
tipc_msg_event cb = up_ptr->msg_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(connected))
goto reject;
if (unlikely(!cb))
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static void port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
case TIPC_NAMED_MSG:{
tipc_named_msg_event cb = up_ptr->named_msg_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (unlikely(connected))
goto reject;
if (unlikely(!cb))
@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ err:
u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (!connected || !cb)
break;
if (msg_origport(msg) != peer_port)
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ err:
case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
tipc_msg_err_event cb = up_ptr->err_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (connected || !cb)
break;
skb_pull(buf, msg_hdr_sz(msg));
@@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ err:
tipc_named_msg_err_event cb =
up_ptr->named_err_cb;
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
if (connected || !cb)
break;
dseq.type = msg_nametype(msg);
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ int tipc_portimportance(u32 ref, unsigne
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
*importance = (unsigned int)msg_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
@@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ int tipc_set_portimportance(u32 ref, uns
if (!p_ptr)
return -EINVAL;
msg_set_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr, (u32)imp);
- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
+ tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
return TIPC_OK;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE : [tipc-discussion] /net/tipc/port.c: Use tipc_port_unlock
2008-01-04 14:47 /net/tipc/port.c: Use tipc_port_unlock Julia Lawall
@ 2008-01-08 15:34 ` Jon Paul Maloy
2008-01-09 7:48 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Paul Maloy @ 2008-01-08 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall, per.liden, jon.maloy, allan.stephens,
tipc-discussion, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
I have no objections.
///jon
--- Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> a écrit :
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> The file net/tipc/port.c takes a lock using the
> function tipc_port_lock and
> then releases the lock sometimes using
> tipc_port_unlock and sometimes using
> spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock). tipc_port_unlock
> simply does the
> spin_unlock_bh, but it seems cleaner to use it
> everywhere.
>
>
> The problem was fixed using the following semantic
> patch.
> (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> struct port *p_ptr;
> @@
>
> p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...)
> ...
> (
> p_ptr = tipc_port_lock(...);
> |
> ?- spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> )
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> ---
>
> diff -u -p a/net/tipc/port.c b/net/tipc/port.c
> --- a/net/tipc/port.c 2008-01-01 10:43:55.000000000
> +0100
> +++ b/net/tipc/port.c 2008-01-04 10:51:05.000000000
> +0100
> @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ int tipc_portunreliable(u32 ref,
> unsigne
> if (!p_ptr)
> return -EINVAL;
> *isunreliable = port_unreliable(p_ptr);
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> return TIPC_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ int tipc_portunreturnable(u32
> ref, unsig
> if (!p_ptr)
> return -EINVAL;
> *isunrejectable = port_unreturnable(p_ptr);
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> return TIPC_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static void
> port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
> u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
> u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (unlikely(!connected)) {
> if (unlikely(published))
> goto reject;
> @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ static void
> port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
> case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
> tipc_msg_event cb = up_ptr->msg_cb;
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (unlikely(connected))
> goto reject;
> if (unlikely(!cb))
> @@ -882,7 +882,7 @@ static void
> port_dispatcher_sigh(void *d
> case TIPC_NAMED_MSG:{
> tipc_named_msg_event cb = up_ptr->named_msg_cb;
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (unlikely(connected))
> goto reject;
> if (unlikely(!cb))
> @@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ err:
> u32 peer_port = port_peerport(p_ptr);
> u32 peer_node = port_peernode(p_ptr);
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (!connected || !cb)
> break;
> if (msg_origport(msg) != peer_port)
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ err:
> case TIPC_DIRECT_MSG:{
> tipc_msg_err_event cb = up_ptr->err_cb;
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (connected || !cb)
> break;
> skb_pull(buf, msg_hdr_sz(msg));
> @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ err:
> tipc_named_msg_err_event cb =
> up_ptr->named_err_cb;
>
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> if (connected || !cb)
> break;
> dseq.type = msg_nametype(msg);
> @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ int tipc_portimportance(u32
> ref, unsigne
> if (!p_ptr)
> return -EINVAL;
> *importance = (unsigned
> int)msg_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr);
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> return TIPC_OK;
> }
>
> @@ -1122,7 +1122,7 @@ int
> tipc_set_portimportance(u32 ref, uns
> if (!p_ptr)
> return -EINVAL;
> msg_set_importance(&p_ptr->publ.phdr, (u32)imp);
> - spin_unlock_bh(p_ptr->publ.lock);
> + tipc_port_unlock(p_ptr);
> return TIPC_OK;
> }
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio
> 2005.
>
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> tipc-discussion mailing list
> tipc-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tipc-discussion
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RE : [tipc-discussion] /net/tipc/port.c: Use tipc_port_unlock
2008-01-08 15:34 ` RE : [tipc-discussion] " Jon Paul Maloy
@ 2008-01-09 7:48 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-01-09 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: maloy
Cc: julia, per.liden, jon.maloy, allan.stephens, tipc-discussion,
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Jon Paul Maloy <maloy@donjonn.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 10:34:58 -0500 (EST)
> I have no objections.
I've applied this patch, thanks everyone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-09 7:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-04 14:47 /net/tipc/port.c: Use tipc_port_unlock Julia Lawall
2008-01-08 15:34 ` RE : [tipc-discussion] " Jon Paul Maloy
2008-01-09 7:48 ` David Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).