LKML Archive on lore.kernel.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* SCHED_FIFO & system()
@ 2008-01-17 10:19 linux
  2008-01-18  6:41 ` Matias Sundman
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: linux @ 2008-01-17 10:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel


Hello,
I have some strange behavior in one of my systems.

I have a real-time kernel thread under SCHED_FIFO which is running every
10ms.
It is blocking on a semaphore and released by a timer interrupt every 10ms.
Generally this works really well.

However, there is a module in the system that makes a / system() / call
from c-code in user-space;

  system("run_my_script");

By calling and running a bash script. Independent of how the actual
script looks like the real time kernel thread does not get scheduled under
the time of 80ms -- the time it takes for the system() call to finish.

I can see when running a LTT session that the wake_up event occurs for
the real time thread 10ms into the system call but nevertheless the real
time kernel thread does not get scheduled.

The thread that calls system("run_my_script") is configured as SCHED_OTHER.

The Kernel is 2.6.21.


Anybody who recognize this or similar situations?



Cheers // Matias

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SCHED_FIFO & system()
  2008-01-17 10:19 SCHED_FIFO & system() linux
@ 2008-01-18  6:41 ` Matias Sundman
  2008-01-18 13:16 ` Gregory Haskins
  2008-01-18 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Matias Sundman @ 2008-01-18  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,
I forgot to add one important detail - the Kernel is configured as - 
Preemptible Kernel (Low-Latency Desktop).

Cheers // Matias

linux@sundmangroup.com skrev:
> Hello,
> I have some strange behavior in one of my systems.
>
> I have a real-time kernel thread under SCHED_FIFO which is running every
> 10ms.
> It is blocking on a semaphore and released by a timer interrupt every 10ms.
> Generally this works really well.
>
> However, there is a module in the system that makes a / system() / call
> from c-code in user-space;
>
>   system("run_my_script");
>
> By calling and running a bash script. Independent of how the actual
> script looks like the real time kernel thread does not get scheduled under
> the time of 80ms -- the time it takes for the system() call to finish.
>
> I can see when running a LTT session that the wake_up event occurs for
> the real time thread 10ms into the system call but nevertheless the real
> time kernel thread does not get scheduled.
>
> The thread that calls system("run_my_script") is configured as SCHED_OTHER.
>
> The Kernel is 2.6.21.
>
>
> Anybody who recognize this or similar situations?
>
>
>
> Cheers // Matias
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SCHED_FIFO & system()
  2008-01-17 10:19 SCHED_FIFO & system() linux
  2008-01-18  6:41 ` Matias Sundman
@ 2008-01-18 13:16 ` Gregory Haskins
  2008-01-18 13:31   ` Gregory Haskins
  2008-01-18 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Haskins @ 2008-01-18 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, rostedt

linux@sundmangroup.com wrote:
> Hello,
> I have some strange behavior in one of my systems.
> 
> I have a real-time kernel thread under SCHED_FIFO which is running every
> 10ms.
> It is blocking on a semaphore and released by a timer interrupt every 10ms.
> Generally this works really well.
> 
> However, there is a module in the system that makes a / system() / call
> from c-code in user-space;
> 
>   system("run_my_script");
> 
> By calling and running a bash script. Independent of how the actual
> script looks like the real time kernel thread does not get scheduled under
> the time of 80ms -- the time it takes for the system() call to finish.
> 
> I can see when running a LTT session that the wake_up event occurs for
> the real time thread 10ms into the system call but nevertheless the real
> time kernel thread does not get scheduled.
> 
> The thread that calls system("run_my_script") is configured as SCHED_OTHER.
> 
> The Kernel is 2.6.21.
> 
> 
> Anybody who recognize this or similar situations?


Hi,
   I am not sure if this is whats happening to you (*), but there is a 
known problem in the mainline tree related to the system allowing lower 
priority threads to stay on the CPU under certain circumstances.

You can see the problem happening with the following test:

http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Preemption_Test

and I know the problem goes back to at least 2.6.16.

Steven Rostedt and I submitted some patches to address the issue, and 
they have been accepted into Ingo's sched-devel tree.  I would suggest 
trying your code against Ingo's tree and see if the problem persists. 
You can get it from:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-sched-devel.git

In the event that this does fix your issue, I will defer to Ingo for 
if/when he plans to push these upstream.

(*) I have no information on whether the futex-plist implemetation was 
pulled from the tree to cause your regression.  It is possible that the 
changes between 22 and 23 are just tickling your environment enough to 
bring out this RT-preempt issue.

HTH!

Regards,
-Greg

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SCHED_FIFO & system()
  2008-01-18 13:16 ` Gregory Haskins
@ 2008-01-18 13:31   ` Gregory Haskins
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Haskins @ 2008-01-18 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gregory.haskins; +Cc: linux, linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, rostedt

Gregory Haskins wrote:

> 
> (*) I have no information on whether the futex-plist implemetation was 
> pulled from the tree to cause your regression.  It is possible that the 
> changes between 22 and 23 are just tickling your environment enough to 
> bring out this RT-preempt issue.
> 


Hmm...seems I should not send out email before my morning coffee ;)

I think I was answering

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/18/43

having read them back to back.  Sorry for the confusion.


There's a chance that this is what is causing your issue, Matias, but 
you should also confirm that what this module is doing doesn't disable 
preemption.  That would also cause the issue.

HTH
-Greg

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: SCHED_FIFO & system()
  2008-01-17 10:19 SCHED_FIFO & system() linux
  2008-01-18  6:41 ` Matias Sundman
  2008-01-18 13:16 ` Gregory Haskins
@ 2008-01-18 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2008-01-18 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar


On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 linux@sundmangroup.com wrote:
> time kernel thread does not get scheduled.
>
> The thread that calls system("run_my_script") is configured as SCHED_OTHER.
>
> The Kernel is 2.6.21.

Could you try the latest kernel, and if that still gives you problems, try
out Ingo's sched-devel (from what Gregory Haskins posted).

Let us know how it turns out.

Thanks,

-- Steve


>
>
> Anybody who recognize this or similar situations?
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-18 16:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-17 10:19 SCHED_FIFO & system() linux
2008-01-18  6:41 ` Matias Sundman
2008-01-18 13:16 ` Gregory Haskins
2008-01-18 13:31   ` Gregory Haskins
2008-01-18 16:37 ` Steven Rostedt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).